Started By
Message

re: Have we talked about the Pfizer Study showing 44% miscarriage rate Flg :Vaccine

Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15556 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:12 pm to
It’s Pfizer’s own data from its adverse events listing they have to give to the FDA.

Correlation isn’t causation. Average miscarriage rate is approximately 20 percent. In this population 44 percent had miscarriages.

It’s possible there’s some other explanation. But Pfizer is just not answering questions about it.

And they should be.

They’re just saying “the vaccine didn’t cause these ladies to have miscarriages.” It’s twice the normal rate. How exactly did they rule that out? They haven’t said. But if it’s their own data, I would say that’s fairly irresponsible for Pfizer not to ask itself internally. But you can avoid doing so if you can make trillions of dollars of Gvt money and be immune from your frickups I guess. It’s good to be the king.

I got the shot so I could travel. I’m not doing it again. Too many unknowns and risks for absolutely zero reward. If it worked, it would have worked.

Pfizer’s FDA data is somewhere over 3000 pages long. You can read it if you want.

Summary with link to download the 4000 pages

Article reviewing results

News article by John Solomon where they just didn’t respond.

John Solomon Article
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 6:13 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32249 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:30 pm to
Ok so I reviewed what you placed and it is in regards to the 50 women in the original trial. Given the mass roll out of the vaccine there should be a much much larger sample size at this point of women who got the vaccine and then became pregnant.

Where is the follow up?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram