- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Have we talked about the Pfizer Study showing 44% miscarriage rate Flg :Vaccine
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:12 pm to BayouBlitz
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:12 pm to BayouBlitz
It’s Pfizer’s own data from its adverse events listing they have to give to the FDA.
Correlation isn’t causation. Average miscarriage rate is approximately 20 percent. In this population 44 percent had miscarriages.
It’s possible there’s some other explanation. But Pfizer is just not answering questions about it.
And they should be.
They’re just saying “the vaccine didn’t cause these ladies to have miscarriages.” It’s twice the normal rate. How exactly did they rule that out? They haven’t said. But if it’s their own data, I would say that’s fairly irresponsible for Pfizer not to ask itself internally. But you can avoid doing so if you can make trillions of dollars of Gvt money and be immune from your frickups I guess. It’s good to be the king.
I got the shot so I could travel. I’m not doing it again. Too many unknowns and risks for absolutely zero reward. If it worked, it would have worked.
Pfizer’s FDA data is somewhere over 3000 pages long. You can read it if you want.
Summary with link to download the 4000 pages
Article reviewing results
News article by John Solomon where they just didn’t respond.
John Solomon Article
Correlation isn’t causation. Average miscarriage rate is approximately 20 percent. In this population 44 percent had miscarriages.
It’s possible there’s some other explanation. But Pfizer is just not answering questions about it.
And they should be.
They’re just saying “the vaccine didn’t cause these ladies to have miscarriages.” It’s twice the normal rate. How exactly did they rule that out? They haven’t said. But if it’s their own data, I would say that’s fairly irresponsible for Pfizer not to ask itself internally. But you can avoid doing so if you can make trillions of dollars of Gvt money and be immune from your frickups I guess. It’s good to be the king.
I got the shot so I could travel. I’m not doing it again. Too many unknowns and risks for absolutely zero reward. If it worked, it would have worked.
Pfizer’s FDA data is somewhere over 3000 pages long. You can read it if you want.
Summary with link to download the 4000 pages
Article reviewing results
News article by John Solomon where they just didn’t respond.
John Solomon Article
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:30 pm to Wednesday
Ok so I reviewed what you placed and it is in regards to the 50 women in the original trial. Given the mass roll out of the vaccine there should be a much much larger sample size at this point of women who got the vaccine and then became pregnant.
Where is the follow up?
Where is the follow up?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)