- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a reasonable defense of not considering the Dollars Trilogy a “true trilogy”?
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:38 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:38 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
the Man With No Name
Mostly a promotional thing.
I mean, I always saw them as stand alone movies.
The Trilogy is that Clint is in them all I guess and mostly dresses the same. Its just a loose series, while Dirty Harry is EXACTLy the same character throughout the sequels.
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 12:00 am
1
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:46 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Right, the man with no name is the same character in all three but they were only marketed as a trilogy after the fact by United Artist.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News