re: Infowars files for bankrupcy

quote:

---

I’m trying to figure what the insinuation here is supposed to be.

---

The main gist of what the conspiracy theorists were proffering was that the kids were not killed, but rather they were being portrayed as older siblings of themselves, and their pictures from a few years prior were used to represent a dead kid that doesn't exist. So if people ask "Where's Braden?" then someone can say "Braden is dead. Aidan is Braden's older brother." But there was no Braden, that's a person they invented using Aidan's old photos.

So in this photo, the theory would be that the middle child is really the oldest girl's old photo that has been PhotoShopped in. It doesn't help that this is the same "dad" that was seen in that link going from laughter to tears in seconds for the camera. It also doesn't help that 0bama was in a photo with 1-2 of them, with the oldest wearing the same dress. Now from what they are saying, it wouldn't make sense that the oldest one ("Emilie") is the one who is said to have been killed, and that 0bama would have been in a photo with her (or her sister wearing the same dress). Then they have the younger two daughters listed as 1 year apart, but this doesn't look like the two youngest are 1 or even 2 years apart:



The reason I'd like to believe this was a hoax is because I don't want to think of these kids being dead, so don't really like discussing it. However, people can have different opinions, and Alex Jones's unfair punishment is just another slippery slope. They call this "hate speech" to not buy the government narrative.