re: Bill Proposed to Repeal Pittman-Robertson

quote:

---

didn't talk about license language. I talked about this

---

Yeah, that's referring to license sells in the state, and the fact that the fees generated from them have to be used by the department (a requirement of P-R).

quote:

---

If the Pittman-Robertson funds are being used correctly.

---

Because maybe it's not enough? The only dedicated dollars that went to WMAs was the permit, which was only required to hunt on a WMA, not for any other use. That has now changed.

LDWF receives no money from the general fund. They are funded by dedicated taxes and license sales.

quote:

---

Never said this.

---

You may as well have. You're fine with paying the same amount for guns as long as it doesn't involve a tax that goes to conservation.

quote:

---

Nope, I want the tax gone because if Congress can send all that foreign aide all over the world, then Congress should pay for the care of federal land(it's own back yard). There is enough there to pay for state owned land also.

---

Or, we could stick with the same formula that doesn't involve the current batch of swamp rats writing new legislation that will u doubtedly give them more money in their own pockets somehow.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.