- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A hundred school shootings a year wouldn't change my mind
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:08 pm to TDTOM
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:08 pm to TDTOM
Why are so many lunatic libs NBA fans?
You are a fricking psychopath bro. Kids just got shot and you post a thread calling for unrestricted gun access to fight a figment of your imagination.
You think putting out a fire with more fire will work. Get help.
You are a fricking psychopath bro. Kids just got shot and you post a thread calling for unrestricted gun access to fight a figment of your imagination.
You think putting out a fire with more fire will work. Get help.
This post was edited on 5/25/22 at 5:09 pm
0
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:13 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
I’d rather deal with guns then Fentanyl
quote:
Not sure why people downvote this. Over 100k people alone died last year from fentanyl
Because wtf does that even have to do with the subject at hand?
Are private citizens with AR-15s saving more people from dying from fentanyl? Thank God, imagine how much worse the opioid epidemic would be without the NRA to save the day.
Are you posting from the Philippines where they have roving bands of government sanctioned motorcycle death squads to extrajudiciously execute accused drug dealers and addicts?
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:23 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
Are private citizens with AR-15
Do you want to ban ARs?
If you do, who do you propose goes door to door taking these firearms?
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:26 pm to Vamos Brandonos
Please watch Red Dawn. Anyone who thinks we should begin letting stupid Democrats take control of our guns may have a different opinion after viewing this classic.
The one with Patrick Swayze was the original. The latest version is just as good, though!
The one with Patrick Swayze was the original. The latest version is just as good, though!
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Just pointing out, that the most likely scenario in any hypothetical Ar-15 "ban," which is likely on the low end of feasible reforms given the constraints of modern politics in our lifetimes, would almost certainly be modeled after the Canadian reforms or similar high ownership country reforms, where, there is some sort of grandfather clause or accompanying licensing tier that places existing AR's in the higher licensing range.
And if by some chance they did a full ban, it would almost certainly just be a voluntary thing where the only way you'd ever be prosecuted is if the police showed up for an unrelated manner and found the gun.
I mean, the obvious thinly veiled threat is exactly why it would never happen that way
And if by some chance they did a full ban, it would almost certainly just be a voluntary thing where the only way you'd ever be prosecuted is if the police showed up for an unrelated manner and found the gun.
I mean, the obvious thinly veiled threat is exactly why it would never happen that way
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:31 pm to Bronc
quote:
Just pointing out, that the most likely scenario in any hypothetical Ar-15 "ban," which is likely on the low end of feasible reforms given the constraints of modern politics in our lifetimes, would almost certainly be modeled after the Canadian reforms or similar high ownership country reforms, where, there is some sort of grandfather clause or accompanying licensing tier that places existing AR's in the higher licensing range.
And if by some chance they did a full ban, it would almost certainly just be a voluntary thing where the only way you'd ever be prosecuted is if the police showed up for an unrelated manner and found the gun.
I mean, the obvious thinly veiled threat is exactly why it would never happen that way
Yet all of this obscurity can be easily solved via Constitutional Amendment. Why isn't that being used?
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:32 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I suspect his point is that for 20 years the insurgency survived and frustrated a powerful adversary
Might I also suggest that 2 summers ago less than 1% of the country was able to bring cities to a halt and paralyze law enforcement with bricks, fireworks, and other crude weapons.
The Taliban operate on a ideology that can't be changed. They live in the middle ages. They can stomach death no matter the circumstances. Americans on the other hand can't do any of the above. They outlasted us because the US quit and they just swept up after without resistance. Otherwise they were getting their asses kicked. The US could have held that country for a 100+ years and the Taliban would have never beeen even close to winning.
People on here talk about "oh not all the military will turn on the citizens" and "we'll get all weapons from the south". Lol, all you need is a nuclear warhead dropped on a major area and your resistance is done for. As for the Mexicans funding your weapons? How you plan on paying for those arms. USA giving away billions in free weapons and aid, you think Mexico gonna give it up for free? Ukraine would be done right now if not for the west giving free arms.
Anyone can bring down a city when the authorities are ordered to stand down and allow rioting and looting.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:36 pm to Vlatket
quote:
Lol, all you need is a nuclear warhead dropped on a major area
You think in a civil war one side will drop a nuke on the land they are trying to take?
frick YA BROS WE WON! THE ENTIRE NATION IS A RADIOACTIVE WASTELAND BUT WE SHOWED THEM NONBELIEVERS!
I always laugh at people like you who are wholly incapable of second and third order affects thinking.
This post was edited on 5/25/22 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:36 pm to Bronc
The supply of parts will be around for a long time, even non serialized lowers. Any bans will create a very lucrative black market.
Hopefully we don't end up with silliness of California "featureless grip" legislation.
I'm not sure what the heck that fixes.
Hopefully we don't end up with silliness of California "featureless grip" legislation.
I'm not sure what the heck that fixes.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm not sure what the heck that fixes.
It fixes nothing, like most laws based on emotional knee jerk reaction. Places like California have just made it an art form.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:40 pm to Centinel
Yeah I was being facetious.
"We have to do something" and "We need more money" are why this nation is fricked up
Society is very ill, we just try to move sharp objects away from them instead of addressing the illness.
"We have to do something" and "We need more money" are why this nation is fricked up
Society is very ill, we just try to move sharp objects away from them instead of addressing the illness.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
we just try to move sharp objects away from them
This is easy.
quote:
instead of addressing the illness.
This is hard.
Easy allows politicians to focus on what's most important, enriching themselves via the taxpayer. That is the only thing that matters to them. Period.
See: Beto's completely out of touch visit. His only calculus in all of this is "how will this get me elected and make me money?"
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:52 pm to Centinel
Bruh you dumb as frick. When you have a government doing everything to keep power sacrificing a major city is an afterthought. You think governments like North Korea wouldn't kill half the population just to stay in power. Doesn't even need to be nuclear there are non nuclear weapons just as effective.
This post was edited on 5/25/22 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:56 pm to Centinel
quote:
This is easy.
quote:
instead of addressing the illness.
This is hard.
The Covid lockdowns show that the political class doesn't make hard decisions. They choose the path simpletons can understand and the fearful appreciate. That leaves the rest of us to bear the burden.
They will come for guns because some of society can't play well with others. Its an easy fix for the rulers, a potential death sentence for law enforcement. But one case shouldn't have an affect.
This post was edited on 5/25/22 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:22 pm to Vlatket
quote:
Bruh you dumb as frick.
I'm not the one comparing this country's government, no matter how flawed. to North Korea you fricking idiot.
Go eat some more crayons dipshit.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:32 pm to Vlatket
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:35 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
18 year old killing 19 kids and 2 adults is not a gun problem. It’s indicative of a lack of God problem.
Interesting theory. So excluding China, because we can't trust what the CCP reports, the next 5 least religious countries in the world are: LINK
Japan LINK
Sweden LINK
France LINK
Australia LINK
Czech Republic LINK
Going back to the fall of communism in the Czech Republic in 1989, there has only been 1 single school shooting I could find in any of those countries. 2002 in Australia when an international student at a university shot and killed 2 other international university students, both 26 LINK
The only other mass killing attack on any school campus in those countries in that time frame where students were killed was a 2001 knife attack in Japan in which 8 students were stabbed to death LINK
If only those countries were closer to God
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:38 pm to Vlatket
quote:
The Taliban operate on a ideology that can't be changed. They live in the middle ages. They can stomach death no matter the circumstances.
Taliban, or GOP?
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:39 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
Taliban, or GOP?
Shiny
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:40 pm to Sun God
quote:
Shiny
Bowl likes polishing turds. It's why he's a diehard Barner.
Page 27 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News