- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why rankings are biased and suck....qb related
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:33 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:33 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
First off no one gives a shite what he does in high school except for high school fans.
Most high school kids are ranked based off of their high school abilities and potential.
quote:In a vacuum, yes. But his stats are bad. They do not warrant his ranking.
Second, tying stars to stats is dumb.
quote:He plays a shite schedule with stud receivers
You need a lot more context, such as Arch’s strength of schedule, the quality of his receivers
1
Posted on 5/24/22 at 10:04 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
Most high school kids are ranked based off of their high school abilities and potential.
We’re on a COLLEGE recruiting board. Whichever team gets Arch won’t give a shite how Newman did or what his stats were.
quote:well they aren’t John Curtis… but that schedule will go from shite to tough in 22.
He plays a shite schedule with stud receivers
A lot of the value in Arch will be in his mentality and how he handles situations, as he has had unlimited opportunity to pick the brains of five Super Bowl rings if you count Brees, whom he undoubtedly knows and idolizes. That’s the value in his pedigree, which makes him more valuable at higher levels than he is in high school.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 10:08 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News