No I'm literally arguing that being convicted in a court of law is based on evidence. Not my fault if you amass the evidence against yourself doing other things you weren't convicted of. I also guarentee you have no functioning alternative. You just want to whine about poor dindinuffin.

And again, when you get done pissing yourself and misconstruing my arguments, I'm arguing that the system is not skewed against the poor but against those who would rather spend their time breaking the law than bettering themselves.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SammyTiger

Baton Rouge, LA

Member since Feb 2009

67490 posts

Posted on 5/6/22 at 11:52 am to squid_hunt

quote:
No I'm literally arguing that being convicted in a court of law is based on evidence. Not my fault if you amass the evidence against yourself doing other things you weren't convicted of. I also guarentee you have no functioning alternative. You just want to whine about poor dindinuffin.

1. None of that is true. 2. If there was. Ton of evidence of other crimes than you would just be convicted of those crimes. 3. You are ignoring the fact that people are wrongfully convicted often on witness testimony.

quote:
And again, when you get done pissing yourself and misconstruing my arguments, I'm arguing that the system is not skewed against the poor but against those who would rather spend their time breaking the law than bettering themselves.

Are you better off with our without a lawyer?
Innocent or Guilty?

Are you better with with a highly paid lawyer?

Is there a public defenders office in the country That has anywhere near the funding per case as their counterpart DAs office?

Not to mention if you are convicted how having a lawyer who has time to work on your case will effect your sentence.

And that’s still your dumb arse ignoring any other law

This post was edited on 5/6/22 at 11:55 am

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board