Started By
Message

re: Star rankings for NFL draft Rd.1

Posted on 4/29/22 at 10:29 am to
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 4/29/22 at 10:29 am to
It just reinforces that 4* and 5* rankings get it right a lot because they have far less in recruiting rankings. That means the probability is much higher to have success with 5* and 4* recruits. Also shows how their limited resources are when lots fall through the cracks and develop. It's not rocket science here.

5* is best bet followed by 4* based on the first round. That's how it's done on recruiting and is correct. There's only about 30 5* a year if that sometimes so to have 9 drafted is amazing. I think there's over 200 4* every year and then obviously 3* is much higher than that.

They grade it as:

5* - instant impact player with high draft pick written all over them

4* - all-american potential player who has high draft ceiling

3* - usually raw but has NFL ceiling and sometimes a varying late/high draft ceiling potential or all-american potential after heavy development. raw that need refining and usually slow developers.

2*, 1*, NR are players that the recruiting services simply shite the bed on because their resources are limited. They're not a big name, they don't go to camps, they slip through cracks. Obviously all have to develop some slower than others which is hard to project and why you get your busts.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 10:41 am
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 4/29/22 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

They grade it as:

5* - instant impact player with high draft pick written all over them

4* - all-american potential player who has high draft ceiling

3* - usually raw but has NFL ceiling and sometimes a varying late/high draft ceiling potential or all-american potential after heavy development. raw that need refining and usually slow developers.

2*, 1*, NR are players that the recruiting services simply shite the bed on because their resources are limited. They're not a big name, they don't go to camps, they slip through cracks. Obviously all have to develop some slower than others which is hard to project and why you get your busts

This is a solid grading philosophy. Whose is it?

I've had a problem with 247's 5* philosophy where they drop guys based on how NFL teams draft their position. So like, they would drop a guard from 5* status because NFL teams supposedly don't draft a lot of guards in the first round.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27463 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

It just reinforces that 4* and 5* rankings get it right a lot because they have far less in recruiting rankings. That means the probability is much higher to have success with 5* and 4* recruits. Also shows how their limited resources are when lots fall through the cracks and develop. It's not rocket science here.



The 4 and 5 star guys usually are the biggest and fastest.

NFL mainly drafts off traits.

The few 2 and 3 star guys that get drafted are just good football players who might run 4.6
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram