Started By
Message
re: Why Sooners are doomed in SEC.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 3:25 pm to 3down10
Posted on 4/18/22 at 3:25 pm to 3down10
By all means, Bama is the top dog in CF, but OU is clearly not a bottom dweller, but to suggest otherwise because of a hunch?
I had a hunch Missouri would flat in the SEC but they have actually thrived. They already have as many SEC division titles as they do in the Big 12.
I had a hunch Missouri would flat in the SEC but they have actually thrived. They already have as many SEC division titles as they do in the Big 12.
quote:
So you think you'll be ok because they will expand the playoffs and that'll give Oklahoma a chance to beat the SEC teams they lost to during the season.
Because what we've seen from Oklahoma so far is they really come alive in the playoffs right?
This post was edited on 4/18/22 at 3:27 pm
1
Posted on 4/18/22 at 3:35 pm to NorthPark
quote:
By all means, Bama is the top dog in CF, but OU is clearly not a bottom dweller, but to suggest otherwise because of a hunch?
I had a hunch Missouri would flat in the SEC but they have actually thrived. They already have as many SEC division titles as they do in the Big 12.
There is limited success in the conference. They can add 100 teams to the conference, but the amount of success available remains the same.
No clue what the hell you are talking about with Mizzou. Are you saying because they won the SEC East a few years? The SEC East is much weaker than the west, and the years Mizzou won the East was even more down than normal.
Outside that, they have a total of 1 winning season. Their conference record is below .500, and again that is while playing on the weaker side of the SEC.
But hey, I guess if that is what you call thriving, then I guess yes, Oklahoma may "thrive".
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News