Started By
Message

re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit

Posted on 3/27/22 at 10:04 am to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
6019 posts
Posted on 3/27/22 at 10:04 am to
A few things :

1.
quote:

That judge let HRC go with the servers, to everyone’s shock


I’m confused by this because I didn’t think any hrc server stuff was ever in front of a judge

2. As for evidence, at a minimum both PA and WI courts have found and ruled that violations occurred, those are undisputed

3. As for recusal , read 28 USC 455 for grounds.
quote:

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.


Is this a reasonable request. I’m guessing not right off the bat. Perhaps this helps with rulings or pisses the judge off. Many of the judges, since appointed for life, have a very high sense of self importance.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125444 posts
Posted on 3/27/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Is this a reasonable request. I’m guessing not right off the bat.
This is why lawyers SUCK!
The standard is "in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." The man owes his lifetime seat to the Clintons who, as defendants, are sworn enemies with the plaintiff, Trump. If that doesn't constitute a reasonable circumstance for questioning impartiality, no such circumstance exists.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
64024 posts
Posted on 3/28/22 at 5:08 pm to
Magistrate initially assigned the vase just reused.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram