Started By
Message

re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit

Posted on 3/27/22 at 9:43 am to
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 3/27/22 at 9:43 am to
That judge let HRC go with the servers, to everyone’s shock
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33814 posts
Posted on 3/27/22 at 9:51 am to
quote:

That judge let HRC go with the servers, to everyone’s shock



That obviously make me feel like he wouldn’t be completely impartial in this new trial. However, I think an easy response to this is to simply assign a judge to this case who wasn’t appointed by either Bill or Don.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5698 posts
Posted on 3/27/22 at 10:04 am to
A few things :

1.
quote:

That judge let HRC go with the servers, to everyone’s shock


I’m confused by this because I didn’t think any hrc server stuff was ever in front of a judge

2. As for evidence, at a minimum both PA and WI courts have found and ruled that violations occurred, those are undisputed

3. As for recusal , read 28 USC 455 for grounds.
quote:

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.


Is this a reasonable request. I’m guessing not right off the bat. Perhaps this helps with rulings or pisses the judge off. Many of the judges, since appointed for life, have a very high sense of self importance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram