- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:04 pm to texridder
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:04 pm to texridder
quote:It really is not that hard ... even for someone suffering from leftist derangement. Just ask Google ( a leftist hack search engine)
What Wayne County issues?
E.g., Breaking: Ballot Count Watcher Describes At Least 130,000 Ballots, ALL FOR BIDEN, Arriving in 3 Vehicles in Detroit at 4 AM ( LINK)
1
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
E.g., Breaking: Ballot Count Watcher Describes At Least 130,000 Ballots, ALL FOR BIDEN, Arriving in 3 Vehicles in Detroit at 4 AM
You post an article from some website called 'State of the Nation' which on the same page posted this teaser headline:
quote:Not a creditable source.
TRAP SET: Dept of Homeland Security controlled “official ballots” production. Dems print extras, not knowing about non-radioactive isotope watermarks on “official ballots”.
The article about the 130,000 ballots was based on a poll worker's affidavit that 130,000 ballots showed up at 4 in the morning and that ALL 130,000 ballots were for Biden. The source for the article is listed as The Gateway Pundit.
The question is: Why didn't these 130,000 votes show up in the risk limiting audit that was performed in Michigan after the election? LINK
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News