- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:06 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:06 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
quote:
UPDATE
Exclusive: Trump calls for recusal of Clinton-appointed judge reviewing his lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, DNC
starting off well
I suspect this is a preemptive strike to cut the legs out of similar motions bu defendants when they get to the appellate court, where there are a lot of Trump appointees
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:09 am to udtiger
quote:
I suspect this is a preemptive strike to cut the legs out of similar motions bu defendants when they get to the appellate court, where there are a lot of Trump appointees
![](https://c.tenor.com/kPUjaQpRwUsAAAAM/well-there-it-is.gif)
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:48 am to udtiger
quote:
I suspect this is a preemptive strike to cut the legs out of similar motions bu defendants when they get to the appellate court, where there are a lot of Trump appointees
I think this corrects my thinking about what I was questioning. I still find it odd that a defendant could have a judge that was appointed by their spouse but maybe it's more common than I thought.
But the above comment definitely makes sense and probably is the true reason for the call for recusal.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)