- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:56 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:56 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Every federal judge in the country was appointed by someone. That doesn’t mean there is an entire class of defendant they automatically can’t hear cases about.
True, but it's very seldom if ever those judges sit on trails involving the spouse of the person who appointed them. I think it's completely reasonable for Trump’s team to ask for a more impartial judge
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:59 am to FredBear
I understand the push to make judges partisan and political actors based on who appointed them, but it’s really just not that big of a deal. This judge will still be subject to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and will rule based on precedent in that Circuit or be reversed later on.
This post was edited on 3/26/22 at 8:00 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)