- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PDF of the entire NOA.
Posted on 3/16/22 at 6:20 pm to Dlab2013
Posted on 3/16/22 at 6:20 pm to Dlab2013
A lot of hearsay in here and not much substance. The text and payment to the “presumed” associate of a recruit are the only concrete evidence. Not sure why this presumption is made and why the hearing would have to accept that.
1
Posted on 3/16/22 at 6:39 pm to ellessuuuu
So they did a whole investigation but keeps using word “it is alleged”. They didn’t come to conclusion?
I can allege someone did something but it doesn’t hold in court even if that someone did it
I can allege someone did something but it doesn’t hold in court even if that someone did it
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News