- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VP touts investments in Central America to curb migration
Posted on 12/13/21 at 12:04 pm to Hester Carries
Posted on 12/13/21 at 12:04 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
This is simply an effective way to do that. More so than walls and border agents, unfortunately
That part right there is pure bullshite.
These tax dollars of yours goes 90% into corrupt politicians pockets (on both sides of the deal) = this is the 'free money" by which high rolling politicians on both sides of the deal are able to purchase multiple million dollar mansions = on their 'civil service' salaries.
GIVING should only be done by INDIVIDUALs using their OWN money. - anything else is a magnet for corruption under the cover of 'charity'
1
Posted on 12/13/21 at 12:10 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
= this is the 'free money" by which high rolling politicians on both sides of the deal are able to purchase multiple million dollar mansions = on their 'civil service' salaries.
If you are going to go with “the money wouldn’t be spent the way you are saying” then why would that not be true for a wall or border security? Couldn’t that money be corruptly misappropriated in a similar fashion?
“Yeah but corruption” isn’t a great argument for or against the hypothesis of an idea. Sure, once you agree on the efficacy of an idea, at its purest, you can discuss corruption.
“Yea but corruption!” Is the same nonstarter that anti-capitalists use.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News