- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Adam Neumann seems to be doing his slight of hand again and people are falling for it
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:25 pm
From the Bulwark -
LINK
Remember WeWork? In case you’ve forgotten: WeWork is/was a company that rented co-working office space. It presented itself as a tech company and rode investment from Softbank to a $47 billion valuation. Eventually people woke up and realized that not only was WeWork not worth $47 billion, but that the corporate ownership structure gave insane levels of control to founder Adam Neumann who, in addition to being highly erratic, used this control to extract about $700 million from the company.1
As WeWork crashed and lost 93 percent of its value, its investors realized that the only way to prevent the company from going to zero was to get rid of Neumann. And so Neumann held the investors hostage and convinced them to pay him another $200 million just to go away.
As I wrote at the time: Think about that for a minute: This asset, WeWork
Will be worth $0.00 if its founder remains in control.
But it might be worth slightly more than $0.00 if the founder leaves.
So the bankers are going to pay this value-sink $200 million not for services rendered, but simply to disappear.
Yay, capitalism!
It gets worse. This $200 million payday will be on top of the $700 million dollars in phantom value that Neumann already extracted from the company before the rest of the market realized that WeWork was a sham. And it will be coming at nearly the same moment that WeWork lays off some 2,000 employees.
I don’t know anything about these workers. And I don’t know what sort of severance they’re getting, but I’m willing to bet that:
(1) None of these employees was such a negative value that their continued presence would have bankrupted the company, as Neumann’s was.
(2) None of them is going to be paid $200 million to stop doing something that’s killing the company.
LINK
Remember WeWork? In case you’ve forgotten: WeWork is/was a company that rented co-working office space. It presented itself as a tech company and rode investment from Softbank to a $47 billion valuation. Eventually people woke up and realized that not only was WeWork not worth $47 billion, but that the corporate ownership structure gave insane levels of control to founder Adam Neumann who, in addition to being highly erratic, used this control to extract about $700 million from the company.1
As WeWork crashed and lost 93 percent of its value, its investors realized that the only way to prevent the company from going to zero was to get rid of Neumann. And so Neumann held the investors hostage and convinced them to pay him another $200 million just to go away.
As I wrote at the time: Think about that for a minute: This asset, WeWork
Will be worth $0.00 if its founder remains in control.
But it might be worth slightly more than $0.00 if the founder leaves.
So the bankers are going to pay this value-sink $200 million not for services rendered, but simply to disappear.
Yay, capitalism!
It gets worse. This $200 million payday will be on top of the $700 million dollars in phantom value that Neumann already extracted from the company before the rest of the market realized that WeWork was a sham. And it will be coming at nearly the same moment that WeWork lays off some 2,000 employees.
I don’t know anything about these workers. And I don’t know what sort of severance they’re getting, but I’m willing to bet that:
(1) None of these employees was such a negative value that their continued presence would have bankrupted the company, as Neumann’s was.
(2) None of them is going to be paid $200 million to stop doing something that’s killing the company.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:30 pm to Eurocat
His pyscho wife played a big part in ruining him and that company.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:54 pm to Eurocat
quote:
The company has, according to Forbes, been recruiting candidates by describing its business as a “next generation multi-family property management system” that would include a tokenized rewards program and crypto payment capabilities. A Flow spokesperson later told Forbes that the job description was largely false and blamed the snafu on an external recruiter the company had worked with.
Neumann and crypto a perfect match. I'm sure it won't be some giant scam...
tech crunch source
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:58 pm to Eurocat
At this point, I don't feel bad for anyone that gets burned by him.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 1:18 pm to Eurocat
There’s this idea in Silicon Valley that founders on their second try tend to be good bets - kinda like the NFL retread HC phenomenon, they’re supposed to have learned from their mistakes and have the same potential as the first go round. And survivor bias says that if they’re giving it a second chance after some rehabilitation time, they’re probably relatively young and talented and now they have some notches on their belt
The issue with the above being that most people believe Neumann has serious personality flaws which may even be forms of personality disorders (extreme narcissist, elements of prejudice in his management, etc). Personality disorders don’t go away, and they were the root of his problems. I can see why someone would take a bet on Neumann bc Neumann actually has a lot of skin in the game here financially, and he took WeWork to a massive high, but I think the risks here don’t go away and it doesn’t end well
The issue with the above being that most people believe Neumann has serious personality flaws which may even be forms of personality disorders (extreme narcissist, elements of prejudice in his management, etc). Personality disorders don’t go away, and they were the root of his problems. I can see why someone would take a bet on Neumann bc Neumann actually has a lot of skin in the game here financially, and he took WeWork to a massive high, but I think the risks here don’t go away and it doesn’t end well
Posted on 8/22/22 at 6:14 pm to Jsand43
wow did you work on the Elizabeth Holmes defense team on the Theranos case?
Popular
Back to top
