- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judges sentence juveniles to more jail time when LSU loses
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:22 pm
Seems obvious to me.
Twitter link
They need to look at wife beatings next.
quote:
When the Louisiana State University football team loses in an upset, it causes judges in Louisiana to add 1,296 days of punishment to juvenile defendants (& 136 extra days of jail time!) as the judges are grumpy. Judges with degrees from LSU are harshest.
Twitter link
They need to look at wife beatings next.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:26 pm to Handsome Pete
Oh please.
And we’re supposed to believe that winning tough games didn’t make the sentences lighter?
How many big upsets in this time period?
quote:
Employing the universe of juvenile court decisions in a U.S. state between 1996 and 2012, we analyze the effects of emotional shocks associated with unexpected outcomes of football games played by a prominent college team in the state. We find that unexpected losses increase sentence lengths assigned by judges during the week following the game. Unexpected wins, or losses that were expected to be close contests ex ante have no impact. The effects of these emotional shocks are asymmetrically borne by black defendants. The impact of upset losses on sentence lengths is larger for defendants if their cases are handled by judges who received their bachelor's degrees from the university with which the football team is affiliated. Different falsification tests and a number of auxiliary analyses demonstrate the robustness of the findings. These results provide evidence for the impact of emotions in one domain on decisions in a completely unrelated domain among a uniformly highly educated group of individuals (judges) who make decisions after deliberation that involve high stakes (sentence lengths). They also point to the existence of a subtle and previously-unnoticed capricious application of sentencing.
And we’re supposed to believe that winning tough games didn’t make the sentences lighter?
How many big upsets in this time period?
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:33 pm to Handsome Pete
Aww those poor criminals
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:33 pm to Handsome Pete
Interested if the Saints have similar effects
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:34 pm to Handsome Pete
All I know is I’m pissed at everybody for a week or two after a bad LSU loss. Good thing I’m not a judge.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:35 pm to Handsome Pete
Study is of the years 1996-2012. I wonder how many got the death penalty the week of 1/9/12.
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 1/30/23 at 10:36 pm to Handsome Pete
quote:That's pitiful. Are you an adult?
All I know is I’m pissed at everybody for a week or two after a bad LSU loss
Popular
Back to top
