- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The thing I hate about expansion is LSU becomes part of the
Posted on 10/5/11 at 9:37 pm to Tiger in Texas
Posted on 10/5/11 at 9:37 pm to Tiger in Texas
I actually like being in there with the newbies. It would make things fresh and interesting. It been about almost 20 years now, time to mix it up a bit. We could help guide them so long as we don't get soft, would be great to play Mizzou in Mizzou, tiger vs tiger.
We could be part of history here, be the first visitor at our new opponent stadium. Although I wonder how is their hospitality.
We could be part of history here, be the first visitor at our new opponent stadium. Although I wonder how is their hospitality.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:06 pm to relapse98
quote:
That's some shitty division there. I like geographical, makes it Much easier to figure out who's who. That random thing B1G has going on and what you're suggesting just don't appeal to me.
I agree.
B1G should have split like this:
West (Central Time):
Nebraska
Iowa
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Northwestern
Illinois
East (Eastern Time):
Michigan
Michigan State
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio State
Penn State
Would have worked out just fine.
They were afraid that having Ohio State and Michigan in the same division with Penn State would be too much power in one division. But I think Wisconsin, Nebraska and Iowa could give them a run for their money.
Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:12 pm to BrerTiger
Missouri is the outlier if you're talking about history.
Arkansas and LSU have played TAMU a lot. Hardly anybody in the SEC has played Mizzou any at all.
Arkansas and LSU have played TAMU a lot. Hardly anybody in the SEC has played Mizzou any at all.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:05 am to nicholastiger
Expansion would seem to benefit those on the Western borders of the conference the most. Alabama can go north, south, east, and west and be recruiting in SEC country. Prior to expansion, LSU and Arkansas could not do that.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:24 am to Monticello
quote:
Expansion would seem to benefit those on the Western borders of the conference the most. Alabama can go north, south, east, and west and be recruiting in SEC country. Prior to expansion, LSU and Arkansas could not do that.
Correct on all fronts.
Arkansas and LSU can finally take advantage of something all the interior schools had in the SEC.
Arkansas is about to have multiple Fan bases travels through the state to get to Ole Miss, MSU, Arkansas, LSU, TAMU and Vanderbilt.
This literally helps the entire Conference.. The western most team (TAMU) resides in the most talent base (providing more balance with the former western most schools Arkansas and LSU) and Kentucky picks up a team as north as they are and some basketball heat.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 1:33 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 7:30 am to Tiger in Texas
What about an Upper Division and a Southern division?
Mizzou, Ark, T A& M, Vanderbilt, Tenn, GA and Kentucky in the upper Division and
LSU, Miss. St., Ole Miss, Bama, Auburn, Fla, South Caro in the Southern..
Mizzou, Ark, T A& M, Vanderbilt, Tenn, GA and Kentucky in the upper Division and
LSU, Miss. St., Ole Miss, Bama, Auburn, Fla, South Caro in the Southern..
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:14 am to Tiger in Texas
quote:
All I know is the A&M-LSU rivalry could become almost as big as LSU-Bama.
If A&M loses 12 of the first 15 or something like that it won't feel like much of a rivalry.
Popular
Back to top
