TAMU Rectruiting would get better

And LSU would gain exposure in Texas as well. It would benefit both schools.

TAMU stopped playing LSU for many reasons. One of which was LSU exposure in Texas. This would benefit LSU, and yes, benefit TAMU as well. But so what, taking some power from Texas is a good thing.

quote:

---

i dont see it helping our recruiting in TX. we already have a good foothold there, and now this lets Saban, cUM, & the rest of the SEC in

---

Sure, the SEC overall would benefit recruiting. But overall, this is a good thing for TAMU and LSU.

Well the conference would most likely need to be realigned somehow and another team would have to be brought in. But in the end, Auburn could play TAMU every other year and gain exposure but the school is still far as sh1t from Houston. Proximity always matters. So yeah, it helps Auburn but minimally. Still benefits LSU and TAMU the most.

quote:

---

which is why LSU would be smart to oppose either A&M or UT entering the SEC. That's a big selling point for LSU to recruits in Texas versus UT and A&M

---

to an extent I agree, but you can argue it'd be offset by the exposure and home and home LSU would get in E TX, an area LSU already recruits well and has TONS of alumni and ties.

Like I said another team would need to be added to offset the odd number. Maybe it would be a team on the east and you keep divisions. I really don't know. But like I said, Auburn and Alabama are still far as sh1t from Texas.

GT or Clemson would be terrible choices. There really aren't any "great" choices east of the Mississippi. VT or FSU would be decent choices but don't expand the market. Clemson and GT would bring nothing to the table other than a longing to be asked.

No it wouldn't. GT and UGA play every year as it is and nobody really cares. I've been to that game before and I've seen UGA get more excited for almost every other big conference game. GT would make no economic sense whatsoever.