Started By
Message

re: Safe adds: Additions that couldn't possibly be mistakes

Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:30 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466661 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

If the SEC adds _______ it wouldn't possibly hurt the SEC.

any addition that doesn't end up with a comparative increase in our tv deals hurts the SEC
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

miami doesn't fill their stadiums but they do add significant national interest - so disagree on that one

And I disagree with this. I think that the SEC already has a ton of national interest. Why else would ESPN look to basically become the SEC network in the fall?
Posted by ShrevetownTiger
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2007
3168 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

any addition that doesn't end up with a comparative increase in our tv deals hurts the SEC


Ok, what schools out there do you believe does this for the SEC? I've been following a lot of your posts because you're objecting to most of what is being said and I agree with some of what your're saying, but I still don't know who you think would help the SEC. Personally, I think A&M does help because, while not the greatest programs, they do bring a lot of the Texas market and do have a somewhat national presence based mostly on their history.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37133 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:46 pm to
I don't understand your thinking

If we had miami then there are a slew of very interesting games that will generate big numbers on a national broadcast

Like say:

Miami/Florida
Miami/FSU
Miami/Tennessee
Miami/UGA

and maybe Miami vs Alabama or LSU

If you replace Miami with Ga Tech or Va Tech those games all generate substantially less interest.

Miami has been the most successful college football program in the NCAA over the last 30 years - that generates a lot of national interest
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/11/10 at 7:22 am to
molsusports, you're absolutely right. Hypothetically, if we added Florida State and Miami, we're not gaining any new tv markets (though we'd be strengthening our hold on any Florida market by taking them away from the ACC), but we'd be adding two teams with national followings.

UF/FSU, FSU/UM, UM/UF. Those are three games right there that everyone in America watches. That = $$$

Anyone who thinks Miami brings nothing to the table doesn't know what he's talking about.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram