- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Predict how many years it takes aTm to win: 1)the West 2)the SEC 3)a BCS Title
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:35 pm to sgallo3
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:35 pm to sgallo3
quote:
I agree, if Texas A&M can lock up the Texas border in recruiting they will win an SEC title in 6 years or so
They won't even have to lock it down. Texas is practically its own country and has enough players for aTm, Texas, and OU to be great just like Florida, FSU, and Miami.
0
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:36 pm to Monticello
Your an idiot. They will be another State. Not good not bad.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:37 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Florida = Texas
A&M = Florida State
You seem to be coming to our side. FSU is a pretty damn good program.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:38 pm to Monticello
quote:
FSU is a pretty damn good program.
in the ACC. they wouldn't have competed for any SEC titles since the resurgence of LSU, Florida, and Alabama
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:39 pm to sgallo3
I see A&M being very similar to Auburn. A few really good seasons where they make a run at a title sprinkled in with a lot of average 9-3 and 8-4 seasons and the rare 6-6 and 7-5. I don't think they'll ever have a losing record.
I say 8 years for west and SEC, 8 to possibly not in the foreseeable future for the BCSNC.
eta another prediction: no one team will dominate the SEC for at least the next decade. I see LSU, UF, BAMA, A&M, and AU trading blows, each taking their turn at the top. I also predict UT and UGA making a return to prominence and Arky may even get to touch the SEC trophy for once. MSU, UK, OM, Vandy, and USCe will continue to bring up the rear.
I say 8 years for west and SEC, 8 to possibly not in the foreseeable future for the BCSNC.
eta another prediction: no one team will dominate the SEC for at least the next decade. I see LSU, UF, BAMA, A&M, and AU trading blows, each taking their turn at the top. I also predict UT and UGA making a return to prominence and Arky may even get to touch the SEC trophy for once. MSU, UK, OM, Vandy, and USCe will continue to bring up the rear.
This post was edited on 9/22/11 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:40 pm to sgallo3
quote:
in the ACC. they wouldn't have competed for any SEC titles since the resurgence of LSU, Florida, and Alabama
This is getting boring. Go start another thread in the Rant about me. You know.....there is a reason they made a conference expansion board and it was not so you could link conference expansion board topics to new threads on the Rant.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:41 pm to Gtiger9757
quote:
I see A&M being very similar to Auburn. A few really good seasons where they make a run at a title sprinkled in with a lot of average 9-3 and 8-4 seasons and the rare 6-6 and 7-5. I don't think they'll ever have a losing record.
I agree. They will have bad years, but when things go right, they will have the talent to win big.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:49 pm to GWfool
quote:
LSU is a traditional powerhouse... they are #14 in all time winning percentage. I dont know where u get this idea that we weren't relevant until saban.
LSU's winning percentage was only marginally better than Texas A&M's after the 1999 season when LSU hired Saban. A&M at that point had actually just overtaken LSU in wins at 603 to 601.
This post was edited on 9/22/11 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:52 pm to JJxvi
He was too young to remember anything before the last decade.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:54 pm to Bob Ag
i dont have to look any further back than January to realize its gonna take more than 6 years for A&M to compete for SEC titles
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:57 pm to sgallo3
quote:
i was born in 1987
explains your whole viewpoint and rationale of LSU, Auburn, A&M, and FSU. You don't know shite before 2003 other than what you've read on an LSU message board.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 10:59 pm to Cdawg
and guess what. the kids they are recruiting are younger than me. do u think they give a shite about anything before 2000?
my first LSU heroes were Eddie Kennison and Kevin Faulk, i guess i picked the right time to be born because i'm pretty sure it's better to be a tiger fan now than it was in the early 90s
my first LSU heroes were Eddie Kennison and Kevin Faulk, i guess i picked the right time to be born because i'm pretty sure it's better to be a tiger fan now than it was in the early 90s
This post was edited on 9/22/11 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:05 pm to Monticello
Is Auburn in the east?
They win the SEC west within 4 years if so.
They win the SEC west within 4 years if so.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:05 pm to sgallo3
quote:
and guess what. the kids they are recruiting are younger than me. do u think they give a shite about anything before 2000?
You are losing this debate with your own arguments. Exactly. Recruits are not going to care about aTm's tradition any more than they care about a Bama national title in the 20's. They will care about what aTm can give them now, which IMO is a better overall college football experience than what Texas can give them in a weak league. The best want to play the best.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:07 pm to Monticello
quote:
They will care about what aTm can give them now, which IMO is a better overall college football experience than what Texas can give them in a weak league. The best want to play the best.
Texas is UT. It's a brand name, A&M is nowhere near that. I see UT fans all over Louisiana, the only A&M fans i see are alumni
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:10 pm to sgallo3
quote:
and guess what. the kids they are recruiting are younger than me. do u think they give a shite about anything before 2000?
You want to address how you know what each and every recruit recruit thinks? go for it. I was addressing your argument points.
quote:
i guess i picked the right time to be born because i'm pretty sure it's better to be a tiger fan now than it was in the early 90s
The last 10 years has been the pinnacle of LSU football.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:15 pm to Cdawg
Top 20 Recruits From the state of Texas this year
Rank Name Pos School
#1 Mario Edwards DE Florida St.
#2 Johnathan Gray RB Texas
#3 Cayleb Jones WR Texas
#4 Trey Williams RB Texas A&M
#5 Malcom Brown DT Texas
#6 Thomas Johnson WR Texas
#7 Kennedy Estelle OL Texas
#8 Matt Davis QB Texas A&M
#9 Kendall Sanders ATH Oklahoma St.
#10 Brian Nance LB list
#11 John Michael McGee OL Oklahoma
#12 Curtis Riser OL Texas
#13 Dominique Wheeler WR Texas Tech
#14 Camrhon Hughes OL Texas
#15 Hassan Ridgeway DE Texas
#16 DeVante Harris DB Oklahoma
#17 Timothy Cole LB Texas
#18 Peter Jinkens LB Texas
#19 LaDarrell McNeil DB Tennessee
#20 Orlando Thomas ATH Texas
neither of the A&M commits on that list had an offer from Texas
Rank Name Pos School
#1 Mario Edwards DE Florida St.
#2 Johnathan Gray RB Texas
#3 Cayleb Jones WR Texas
#4 Trey Williams RB Texas A&M
#5 Malcom Brown DT Texas
#6 Thomas Johnson WR Texas
#7 Kennedy Estelle OL Texas
#8 Matt Davis QB Texas A&M
#9 Kendall Sanders ATH Oklahoma St.
#10 Brian Nance LB list
#11 John Michael McGee OL Oklahoma
#12 Curtis Riser OL Texas
#13 Dominique Wheeler WR Texas Tech
#14 Camrhon Hughes OL Texas
#15 Hassan Ridgeway DE Texas
#16 DeVante Harris DB Oklahoma
#17 Timothy Cole LB Texas
#18 Peter Jinkens LB Texas
#19 LaDarrell McNeil DB Tennessee
#20 Orlando Thomas ATH Texas
neither of the A&M commits on that list had an offer from Texas
This post was edited on 9/22/11 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:17 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Texas is UT. It's a brand name, A&M is nowhere near that. I see UT fans all over Louisiana, the only A&M fans i see are alumni
What you don't seem to understand is UT hit a homerun with the Mack Brown hire and A&M struck out with Fran. Fran actually killed A&M worse than Hallman did LSU.
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:18 pm to Cdawg
the only reason LSU got out of our hole was because we could lock up Louisiana recruiting and recover. A&M doesn't have that luxury
Posted on 9/22/11 at 11:25 pm to sgallo3
Are you suggesting the state of Texas doesn't supply enough D1 blue chippers for A&M to compete?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News