- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Orangebloods.com is reporting:
Posted on 6/12/10 at 7:41 am to ffishstik
Posted on 6/12/10 at 7:41 am to ffishstik
quote:
Utah makes more sense to me for the Pac Con than A+M. Sorry, but I'm still hung up on teams actually being in a general region. and this would actually be a good rival for Colorado.
This principal was already thrown out the window when the Pac-10 offered half the Big 12 teams. I'm hoping the SEC sticks to this principal when going after teams for expansion.
0
Posted on 6/12/10 at 7:42 am to CatahoulaTigers
quote:The PAC 10 traveling is gonna be a joke! Sorry in this case Bigger is not better.
That if A&M does goes to the SEC, that their spot will likely go to the Utah Utes.
Texas schools playing games in Washington ST parents should love that travel time to see their kids play.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 8:21 am to Dennis4LSU
Everybody keeps talking about travel. In the new crap 16 they won't play each other. according to one article i read it would be the pac 10 teams minus the AZ schools in one division and they would all play each other. then the former big 12 schools plus AZ schools in the other. at the end of the season both division champs get a BCS bid and never play for an outright champion because the PAC 10 doesn't like the idea of a championship game. This is why TX wants in so bad because they would have a BCS birth every year!
Posted on 6/12/10 at 8:26 am to Navtiger1
quote:
Everybody keeps talking about travel. In the new crap 16 they won't play each other.
They will in every sport other than football...
Posted on 6/12/10 at 8:28 am to DocBugbear
Great....if Utah leaves the MWC there goes 1 yearly opponent to actually give Boise a fight. Boise in the MWC would be no different than them in the WAC! Win one game a year and you're in the BCS. At least with the current set up, they'd have to play TCU and Utah every year.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 8:39 am to Navtiger1
quote:
minus the AZ schools in one division and they would all play each other. then the former big 12 schools plus AZ schools in the other
that still sucks for the AZ schools.. bye bye short trips to LA.. hello Texas and Oklahoma..
Posted on 6/12/10 at 8:55 am to CatahoulaTigers
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:02 am to WG_Dawg
If Utah goes PAC-?, the MWC will take Kansas, K-State and Missou (along with Boise who is already in).
If Utah stays MWC, those three teams have to fight for 2 remaining slots.
If Utah stays MWC, those three teams have to fight for 2 remaining slots.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:06 am to coldhotwings
quote:
How does Utah offer more than Kansas?
It’s closer to the Pacific.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:10 am to Choctaw Hog
quote:
It’s closer to the Pacific.
I didn't think that mattered to them when choosing which schools to join.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:32 am to Choctaw Hog
quote:
How does Utah offer more than Kansas?
They aren't under investigation by the NCAA and FBI.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:44 am to yurintroubl
quote:
They aren't under investigation by the NCAA and FBI.
No shite...
Kansas is one big clusterfrick right now.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News