- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is Ohio State to blame at all?
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:21 pm
I know the driving force behind the expansion is the TV deal, but does the fact that Ohio State and the rest of the Big Ten have sucked in big games recently play a part in the Big Ten (and then the rest of the conferences) wanting to expand and get some better teams to try and change that reputation?
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:38 pm to lesgeaux
The motivation behind expansion is to get the Big Ten Network on as many tvs in America as they can. Not even the Ivy League schools have a network to advertise their institutions. The Big Ten and its member institutions have a chance to solidify themselves as the premiere public institutions in the country. While college football brings in millions a year, academics have the potential for billions a year. Michigan brought in $5 billion last year. During the school year they rake in almost $20 million a day.
The funds from sports look like a lemonade stand compared to what the Big Ten has a chance to do in academics.
The funds from sports look like a lemonade stand compared to what the Big Ten has a chance to do in academics.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:59 pm to NeutralFan
quote:Academically?
The Big Ten and its member institutions have a chance to solidify themselves as the premiere public institutions in the country.

The ACC and Pac10 would be very surprised to hear that.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I know the driving force behind the expansion is the TV deal, but does the fact that Ohio State and the rest of the Big Ten have sucked in big games recently play a part in the Big Ten (and then the rest of the conferences) wanting to expand and get some better teams to try and change that reputation?
Yeah that's the reason.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:07 pm to Grabo
quote:Obviously a playoff game is the reason. Notre Dame may yet grow to regret not doing a deal.
Yeah that's the reason.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:38 pm to SprintFun
quote:
NC_Tigah
The Pac-10 and ACC dont have a 24/7/365 network to advertise their schools. The Big Ten Network has academic programming throughout the year, interviews with professors, campus tours, research profiles, etc. I would think most schools would like to get paid millions of dollars to advertise.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:59 pm to NeutralFan
quote:By any measure, attempting to place the Big 10 on an academic scale equivalent to Duke, UVA, UNC, Georgia Tech, etc or Stanford, Cal, USC, UCLA, etc is simply witless.
The Pac-10 and ACC dont have a 24/7/365 network to advertise their schools. The Big Ten Network has academic programming throughout the year, interviews with professors, campus tours, research profiles, etc. I would think most schools would like to get paid millions of dollars to advertise.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 11:04 pm to lesgeaux
The Ohio State hate on this board is so ridiculous. This thread is a joke.


Posted on 6/12/10 at 11:10 pm to nola tiger lsu
quote:
The Ohio State hate on this board is so ridiculous.
I dont ever really notice it
Posted on 6/12/10 at 11:11 pm to DollaChoppa
Ha... I assume thats a joke.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 11:21 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Explaining academics to southern people has always been a challenge.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 11:25 pm to NeutralFan
sounds like you don't know as much about teaching as you think you do then...
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:10 am to NeutralFan
quote:
The motivation behind expansion is to get the Big Ten Network on as many tvs in America as they can. Not even the Ivy League schools have a network to advertise their institutions. The Big Ten and its member institutions have a chance to solidify themselves as the premiere public institutions in the country. While college football brings in millions a year, academics have the potential for billions a year. Michigan brought in $5 billion last year. During the school year they rake in almost $20 million a day.
The Ivy League does not need its own network they have the broadcast and cable news networks, including Fox,, and C-SPAN.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:29 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
By any measure, attempting to place the Big 10 on an academic scale equivalent to Duke, UVA, UNC, Georgia Tech, etc or Stanford, Cal, USC, UCLA, etc is simply witless.
The Big 10 is deeper academically than the ACC but the ACC clearly has more schools in the top 50. BTW, you missed Wake Forest, BC and Miami all of whch are top 50 universities. Still, the ACC is easily the premier academic BCS conference in the nation IMO.
After Stanford, Cal, USC, UCLA and Washington the PAC 10 becomes pathetic academically. After Washington at number 42 you have to go all the way down to #102 to find Arizona. The Big Ten overall is a much better conference academically than the PAC 10. However, I'd be proud for either of my kids to sport a degree from one of their top 5 universities.

Posted on 6/13/10 at 9:34 am to VABuckeye
quote:
VABuckeye
Very well put. Unfortunately most people on this board cannot comprehend this.
Popular
Back to top
