- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Doug Gottlieb is reporting A&M, FSU, Clemson and Missouri to SEC
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:04 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:04 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Screw Missou. The SEC needs Kansas basketball. The SEC is king when it comes to football no matter what happens. Kansas and Kentucky basketball would be instant cred for the conference. These two basketball powerhouses are so big, they don't take a backseat to Duke/Unc or anyone else. The conference still expands its tv market.
I really doubt Florida will vote to invite FSU to share its SEC area. I know S Carolina can't afford to share it's area with Clemson.
I really doubt Florida will vote to invite FSU to share its SEC area. I know S Carolina can't afford to share it's area with Clemson.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:09 pm to tiger713
if adding these teams helps us get night games back, I'm all for it
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:09 pm to LSU92
SEC doesn't need any of the teams in my opinion. Hell get rid of ar-kansas and vanderbilt and then let everyone play everyone. This dual conf. shite is stupid. At what point do we become two seperate conf.'s?
It is asinine to have teams in the SEC that we don't even play every year.
Yeah yeah I know... unfortunately it is all about the money and not what makes football sense.
It is asinine to have teams in the SEC that we don't even play every year.
Yeah yeah I know... unfortunately it is all about the money and not what makes football sense.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:23 pm to SeattleTiger19
quote:
Too many Tigers for one conference.
didn't think about this as it is really fricking true
but i was thinking clemson would be a good addition to bring in a nice rival for USC
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:23 pm to omegaman66
I agree, but we all know that isn't happening. I don't want the west division to become the defacto Big 12 conference plus LSU.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:44 pm to Arangotang
quote:
clemson tigers, missouri tigers, lsu tigers, auburn tigers
Maybe we can start using our true and rightful name of Fighting Tigers
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:55 pm to wilfont
Way too many Tigers for one conference. Sheesh. Keep Missouri and Clemson out.
Get FSU and Texas A&M and call it good. Or Oklahoma and Texas (won't happen).
Get FSU and Texas A&M and call it good. Or Oklahoma and Texas (won't happen).
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:16 pm to ipodking
quote:
frick Clemson and Mizzu,
How are these two any worse than Arkansas, Ole Miss, Moo U, USCe, Vandy?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:23 pm to cornstarch
quote:
Get FSU and Texas A&M and call it good. Or Oklahoma and Texas (won't happen).
this.
Popular
Back to top

1






