- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could someone tell me why Florida and A&M would be permanent opp?
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:47 am
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:47 am
I keep reading this.
2
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:51 am to Lacour
where did you read this? my guess would be A&M and UGA or Tennessee
i say those teams with the assumption that Auburn would move to the east and have Bama and their permanent.
i say those teams with the assumption that Auburn would move to the east and have Bama and their permanent.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 11:56 am to Rouge
Wishful thinking so LSU doesn't have to play them every year!!
Posted on 9/29/11 at 2:49 pm to LSUDonMCO
I would be a fan of any of Fla/UGA/UT as A&M's rival. South Carolina would be ok and Vandy or Kentucky would be pretty blah. I have been waking up with nightmares of having WVU somehow getting in to the SEC and A&M getting them. Have no desire to go play Mountain Tard every year. Much rather have a traditional SEC school. Georgia would be great because it is an easy flight and still driveable, same with Tennessee or Florida though less so.
A big part of the reason I wanted A&M out of the Big 12 was lame road trips to crapholes like the Big 12 North schools (esp sans Nebraska) have, much less Tech or Baylor.
A big part of the reason I wanted A&M out of the Big 12 was lame road trips to crapholes like the Big 12 North schools (esp sans Nebraska) have, much less Tech or Baylor.
Posted on 10/3/11 at 1:35 pm to aggressor
I'm not sure how much of an impact this would have on it but Machen and Loftin (both school presidents) have a very good relationship which was clear during the ceremony last Monday.
Posted on 10/3/11 at 2:09 pm to Lacour
quote:
I keep reading this
I haven't seen too much of this, but I can't see it happening either. The only way that LSU loses UF as a permanent opponent is if permanent opponents are done away with. The presidents of UF and A&M have a friendship, but that's about it. It makes more sense for A&M to pick up UGA or UT if Mizzou joins and Auburn moves east, or a 14th team that joins the east.
Posted on 10/3/11 at 6:36 pm to Filmat11
If it's about getting to Atlanta, a LSU/A&M trade isn't all bad for the Gators.
Posted on 10/3/11 at 7:49 pm to Tigerntx
We'll take whomever the F the SEC decides we should play. That is all.
But I would like a yearly game with FU....er...I mean UF...
Best fight song in the SEC, IMHO.
But I would like a yearly game with FU....er...I mean UF...
Best fight song in the SEC, IMHO.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 1:11 am to KaiserSoze99
Assuming Mizzou joins, Move aub to the east. What brings tv money is marquee matchups. You lose ala-tenn and lsu-aub, but you have tamu-tenn (another UT for the Aggies to play) as well as ala-aub, lsu-uf, lsu-ala, etc. Lsu-aub rarely played anyway before divisions and aub was always an Eastern team historically. Plus this as balanced as you get considering all time win %.
West win% East win%
Miz 54 -> uk 50
Ark 59 -> usc 50
Tam 60 -> tenn 69
Lsu 64 -> uf 63
Miss 56 -> vu 50
Msu 48 -> uga 64
Ala 71-> aub 63
58.9% 58.4%
West win% East win%
Miz 54 -> uk 50
Ark 59 -> usc 50
Tam 60 -> tenn 69
Lsu 64 -> uf 63
Miss 56 -> vu 50
Msu 48 -> uga 64
Ala 71-> aub 63
58.9% 58.4%
This post was edited on 10/4/11 at 1:14 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News