Started By
Message

re: Woodward is not done because of tonight

Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:21 am to
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71870 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:21 am to
Brother
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24843 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:24 am to
quote:

It was always Petersen
Possible.

But if it was always Petersen, why wouldn't the announcement have already been made? Absolutely nothing negative could come from announcing him.

Could very well be, though. I lean toward Aranda or Rhule. At this point, anyone else not named Petersen, Saban, Belichick or Sean Payton would be a total letdown.
Posted by Passing Wind
Dutchtown
Member since Apr 2015
4139 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:25 am to
quote:

It was always Petersen
then why not announce him sooner? It’s not like he had a season to finish out. I keep seeing it’s Peterson (obviously it’s Peterson night but I didn’t get the memo), but if it’s him why have we taken even till now to announce him? He could have been getting things rolling in his new office, and helping O pack his shite while O finished the season.
This post was edited on 11/28/21 at 2:38 am
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
30035 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:26 am to
I don’t get the infatuation with Peterson
Posted by Passing Wind
Dutchtown
Member since Apr 2015
4139 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:26 am to
You beat me to it
Posted by ifyouonlyknew
Jackson,Mississippi
Member since Oct 2015
336 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:40 am to
I am not sure why Petersen's name is being brought up.He said he wasn't interested in the USC job last month and the USC media said he wasn't interested in getting back into coaching at this time,so they will move on to someone else.
Posted by lsuguy84
CO
Member since Feb 2009
19779 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:41 am to
USC sucks, mate
Posted by ifyouonlyknew
Jackson,Mississippi
Member since Oct 2015
336 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 2:43 am to
You left off the part where it was added he wasn't looking to get back into coaching at this time.
Posted by EastTexasTiger
Lufkin, Tx.
Member since Feb 2007
3824 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 4:48 am to
I’d take Petersen. I don’t want Riley at this point. Petersen is a more complete coach anyway.
Posted by Curtis Lowe
Member since Dec 2019
1277 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 5:27 am to
quote:

Possibly and I really think that whoever it is it’s already done and that’s why O has been told to go ahead and go before the bowl


The reason O is gone has more to do with recruiting.

Contact period starts on Nov. 28th (with in home visits) and only so many coaches are allowed to recruit under NCAA rules.

Basically, a newly hired head coach would not be able to recruit for LSU if O was still the head coach thru the bowl game; therefore O is gone/terminated as of the end of the regular season (Nov. 27th).

Also the reason for the interim head coach for the bowl game.

This would tend to indicate that a hire has been made or will "officially" be made on the 28th allowing the new HC to contact recruits on behalf of LSU.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram