- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who Is the more lucrative hire? Clancy or Shoop?
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:20 pm to Whiskey Richard
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:20 pm to Whiskey Richard
This site is going off the deep end with sarcasm.
0
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:24 pm to Whiskey Richard
In all honesty, I'm really hoping it's Shoop. He's 10 years younger than Chavis, and looks to have a more aggressive approach, which I love. Hopefully we can look back at losing Chavis as being a blessing in disguise, and not just saying that as a sour grapes response.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:26 pm to Whiskey Richard
Shoop looks very good. Clancy had everyone creaming because he was the most likely to bring in O as well
Posted on 1/7/15 at 9:29 pm to BhamBengal
O has been saying he would take the job if asked. Is it completely out of the question that Shoop would approach O if he was hired?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:43 am to Whiskey Richard
OK. Got it.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:52 am to Whiskey Richard
I would have preferred Stoops. But doesn't matter now. Miles couldn't get either one.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:41 pm to Whiskey Richard
That's a hypothetical. No way to tell who would develop the players better, recruit better and connect better unless we try them.
I think both were an upgrade.
I think both were an upgrade.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News