- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wheter it is difficult or not
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:25 pm
I think there'd be a huge advantage in hiring either Mullen, Petrino, or Malzahn as coach:
At least it would put someone else in the West at a disadvantage. Hell it might be worth a win a season right there.
Maybe Malzahn is a reach as HC, but with Chavis that's gold. Last year he had just about completed given AU a new offensive identity while LSU still doesn't have one.
4
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:26 pm to willeteal
No way in frick we should hire Malzahn.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:27 pm to BayouBengals03
why?
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:29 pm to willeteal
id go after petrino in a heartbeat but his contract doesnt even allow him to talk to sec schools...
petrino would win a NT next year with out offensive talent...
imagine, petrino offense, chavis def....hmm...i just got wood...
petrino would win a NT next year with out offensive talent...
imagine, petrino offense, chavis def....hmm...i just got wood...
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:30 pm to TigerFan55555
i think mullen would come though, i think he is waiting on us, it did surprise me that he didnt take florida though....so he might possibly stay at state...dont know why but he may...
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:30 pm to willeteal
quote:im driving that bandwagon already, better jump on board!
Maybe Malzahn is a reach as HC, but with Chavis that's gold. Last year he had just about completed given AU a new offensive identity while LSU still doesn't have one.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:31 pm to TigerFan55555
Mullen would be a great hire.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:31 pm to willeteal
No to Malzahn
YES to MULLEN
YES to MULLEN
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:36 pm to Angry LLAMA
Who knows whether or not Mullen was officially offered by Florida??
I've heard conflicting reports.
I've heard conflicting reports.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:38 pm to CarlockLSU
quote:i think everyone just assumed who better than mullen to keep what urban started than his former OC. but if you listen to their AD, muschamp is the only person they contacted...
Who knows whether or not Mullen was officially offered by Florida??
I've heard conflicting reports.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:42 pm to Angry LLAMA
Then there's absolutely no reason to believe Mullen wouldn't come to LSU if offered. Nobody would argue against LSU being a much higher profile job than MSU and we all know money talks. I can't remember whether or not he signed the contract extension at MSU, but even if he did, that wouldn't necessarily stop him from coming here... Saban signed an extension before the 2004 season and we all know what happened less than a year later....
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:45 pm to athletemed
quote:
why?
Because he has been successful for one year at the college level with arguably the greatest college football player ever running his offense.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:55 pm to BayouBengals03
quote::ignorant:
Because he has been successful for one year at the college level with arguably the greatest college football player ever running his offense
Posted on 1/6/11 at 2:57 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Because he has been successful for one year at the college level with arguably the greatest college football player ever running his offense.
Auburns offense was good last year too..
Posted on 1/6/11 at 3:04 pm to bmy
Petrino is not an option for LSU. He just signed a new contract and CAN'T leave for another SEC school this year.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 3:05 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
YES to MULLEN
And Mullen may be kind of frustrated at hanging 50 on UM and then having two of his biggest recruits decommit.
That doesn't happen as often in Baton Rouge -- and when it does you just call the next 4-star in line.
Then again, somebody from Florida said Mullen was a very lazy recruiter. LSU is a good place to be if you're a lazy recruiter, but I'd like to find out the truth about that -- and if so, you just can't have it when the arms we have going on in this division
Posted on 1/6/11 at 3:08 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe Malzahn is a reach as HC, but with Chavis that's gold. Last year he had just about completed given AU a new offensive identity while LSU still doesn't have one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can why Malzahn is a popular choice. But LSU would be taking a chance when they don't need to. Malzahn has only proven to be a good coordinator for two years and one of those years he had Cam Newton. If LSU hires him, what is he going to do with JJ? There are better, more experienced options for LSU.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe Malzahn is a reach as HC, but with Chavis that's gold. Last year he had just about completed given AU a new offensive identity while LSU still doesn't have one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can why Malzahn is a popular choice. But LSU would be taking a chance when they don't need to. Malzahn has only proven to be a good coordinator for two years and one of those years he had Cam Newton. If LSU hires him, what is he going to do with JJ? There are better, more experienced options for LSU.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News