Started By
Message

re: The reason chavis left is...

Posted on 1/10/15 at 1:17 pm to
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 1/10/15 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Chavis' age drove this issue and LSU should have recognized that.


Man you do have the correct name that is for sure NITWIT!!!!

Your post is plain idiotic. Whether people want this or not Miles is here for another 3 years unless he absolutely pulls a Cizik next season and wins no SEC games or decides he is retiring. So the Miles clause would not have affected Chief's 3 year contract. Now Chief might not have liked that clause in the contract but all outlets have stated that would have been negotiable.

This had nothing to do with contract and everything to do with Chief was tired of the inept offense we run and the strain it puts on his defense. He was offered more money at a very good university with all the resources and the WANT to build a championship program. He will help bring a championship to that program and that is LSU's loss.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12270 posts
Posted on 1/10/15 at 1:34 pm to
Sorry my post doesn't fit your narrative, dude bro.
If your (heheh) reasoning, is correct, LSU would have no reason to make the clause a sticking point.
Nor would Chavis.
Of course, it's possible you know more about the importance of this issue to the actual parties involved in the negotiation, than THEY do.
But, seems like it's more likely you're just another witless "dude bro".
Posted by Paratiger
Haughton, La
Member since Nov 2014
428 posts
Posted on 1/10/15 at 1:58 pm to
huh!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram