Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:45
Registered on:10/14/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
ya. Obviously i messed that detail up. What do you think of the rest of the idea?
What do you think of the concept. Details can be worked out. I messed up on the UGA and FL games.
ya i had ChatGPT edit my idea and missed that. What do you think of the idea?
The SEC is moving to a 9-game conference schedule. Coaches are concerned about too many matchups leading into the 12-team playoff especially if a team ends up playing 10 (9 + SEC championship) SEC games + 4 playoff games.

This idea keeps the schedule at 12 games total before the playoff, but builds the SEC Championship into the 9th SEC game, and fixes tie-breakers ON THE FIELD.

It also creates an extra bye week for teams making the playoff because they’re not adding an extra SEC game on top.

Here’s how the season would look:

Weeks 1–10

6 scheduled SEC games (except for SEC rivals)

Out-of-conference games sprinkled in

Rivalries that are also SEC games remain locked into the schedule

Week 11 — Flex Matchups to Sort Standings
Teams are ranked by SEC record. Matchups are set to reduce logjams and position multiple SEC teams for the playoff. We don’t force 1 vs 2 yet — we keep them away from each other to help maximize playoff bids.

Examples could be:
1 vs 5, 2 vs 6, 3 vs 7, 4 vs 8, etc.

This helps separate the standings fairly without top teams beating each other up too early.

Week 12 — Rivalry Week (unchanged)
Iron Bowl, Egg Bowl, Texas-A&M, Georgia-Florida, etc.
OOC rivalries (UGA-GT, UK-Louisville) stay here.

Week 13 — Championship and Final SEC Games
Everyone plays their 9th SEC game here.
Matchups based on updated standings:

#1 vs #2 ? SEC Championship
(Winner = conference champ, likely Top-4 seed and playoff bye)

#3 vs #4 ? Fighting for easier playoff spot.

#5 vs #8 + #6 vs #7 ? Still meaningful SEC games
(borderline teams still fighting their way into the playoff)

#9–#16 SEC teams still play SEC opponents too, so every team ends the year with exactly 9 SEC games.

Why this works:

Fixes tie-breakers in real games, not committee rooms

Protects rivalries permanently

Adds one extra bye week for rest and recovery

Better chance the SEC gets 5–6 playoff teams every year

Coaches can’t argue against player safety because the schedule never exceeds 9 SEC games

Bottom line:
The playoff basically starts in early November — but without punishing the teams good enough to make the playoff.

Thoughts? Would you support something like this as a fan?
What about going the other Direction, but more slowly?

30 year Loan - normal now.

Reduce the max duration by 1 year per year for the next 10 years.

Get down to a 20 year Loan.

I think then we might be able to have affordability and people to belive they can obtain ownership.
I would look into companies that integrate with your payroll provider. Then look for ones that offer low cost investments.

We use Vestwell and like it.
I was in a similar position when I was your son.

If he is getting paid as 1099 (and not royalties / distributions) I would say he should do the following:

Create LLC (not 100% necessary, but it is good for a few reasons, seperating liabilities, making it "feel" more like a business).

1) Create solo 401k or SEP IRA with LLC. Max it out
2) Draw a normal salary. $50-100k/yr
3) Invest the majority of the rest in index funds (VTI is my recomendation)
4) Keep some retained earnings to try to expand business if you think that is at all possible.
Ya I think it sucks for those people. Does that mean we should just always have inflated PE values?
Hey everyone, I’ve got a theory on why the stock market’s been tanking since President Trump dropped those global tariffs, and why it’s actually a *good* thing in the long run. The S&P 500 was riding high, peaking around 6,100 with a crazy P/E ratio of 27, way above the historical norm of 15-17. That’s like the market was pricing stocks as if they were as safe as government bonds, betting Uncle Sam would swoop in with bailouts no matter what. But those tariffs threw a wrench in that fantasy, and now the market’s waking up. Instead of panicking, I think this is the start of a healthy reset that’ll make things better for all of us.

Here’s the deal: that sky-high P/E of 27 meant stocks were overvalued, with prices out of whack compared to what companies were actually earning. Investors got cocky, throwing cash at anything with a ticker symbol, assuming the government had their back. But tariffs mean higher costs and slimmer profits, and suddenly, nobody’s so sure about those bailouts. The market’s now scrambling to find a more realistic P/E, closer to the historical average of 15. This shakeout is painful, nobody likes seeing their portfolio bleed, but it’s like clearing out a cluttered garage. It forces money to flow to companies that deserve it, not just the ones riding the hype train.

Let’s break it down with some quick math to see where this might land. At its peak of ~6,100, the S&P 500 had a P/E of 27, which means earnings were about 226 (6,100 ÷ 27). If the market corrects to a P/E of 15, keeping those same earnings, the S&P would settle around 3,390 (226 × 15). That’s a big drop, about 44% from the top, but it’s not the end of the world. It’s the market getting back to reality, pricing stocks based on what companies actually produce instead of blind optimism. Sure, it stings now, but this kind of reset stops the bubble from growing until it pops way worse later.

Why’s this a win? Because a market with a sane P/E rewards good businesses, the ones innovating, growing, and delivering real value. Right now, too much cash is tied up in overpriced stocks that don’t justify their valuations. This correction, sparked by the tariff shock, is like hitting the refresh button. It’ll hurt short-term, no question, but long-term, it means capital goes where it’s most effective, building stronger companies and a healthier economy. So yeah, the market’s rough, but I’m betting this rebalance sets us up for something better.

What do you all think?
The example I provided is the carried interest loophole essentially.

Person A is getting a larger share of the gain than their pure investment would warrant. In this case person A is the GP.

Another example:

Person C invests $0 in a company
Person D invests $1000k in a company.

The company doubles in value over 5 years.

Person C is allocated $100k of the gain
Person D is allocated $900k of the gain

Capital gain tax is 15%
Ordinary income tax is 30%

How much should Person C pay in tax?

How much should person A pay in tax from my previous example.

I don’t have an opinion on this topic. Just illustrating how it works.
I don’t get what you mean I did not downvote. I like the topic. I don’t post much so let me know if I am doing something wrong.
Here is a hypothetical.

Person A invests $100k in a project
Person B invests $900k in a project

5 years later they sell the project for $2 million. Resulting in $1 million in capital gain total.

Person A gets allocated $200k of the gain
Person B gets allocated $800k of the gain

long term capital gains rate is 15%
for purpose of this conversation lets assume income tax is 30%

What should person A be taxed?
I was thinking how we could truly attract the best. Surely the best are worth a lot on the open market.

Here is my proposal.

$100k min salary starting at age 20.

Needs to increase by $10k minimum until 35. So at 35 if you’re not making $250k you got to go back.

This allows truly exceptional people to come in and prevents abuse of low cost wages to suppress American workers.

Also - once in an h1b visa you can switch companies easily as long as new company hits wage requirement.

re: Mt Rushmore of MAGA

Posted by ryanthe4aces on 11/6/24 at 7:20 pm to
All time:

Donald
Bannon
Elon
Tucker

This cycle
Donald
Elon
Rogan
Vance

re: Last SEC Game on CBS

Posted by ryanthe4aces on 12/3/23 at 8:07 pm to
I hope they use a new theme.

Last SEC Game on CBS

Posted by ryanthe4aces on 12/3/23 at 7:35 pm
Let’s get back to important topics..

The last SEC game was played on CBS yesterday. End of an era.
Even in hypotheticals Bama gets all the breaks!

Saban Botox or facelift?

Posted by ryanthe4aces on 12/3/23 at 11:56 am
His face looks different

LSU caused this mess

Posted by ryanthe4aces on 12/3/23 at 10:37 am
Couldn’t beat FSU earlier in the year.
This LSU team would probably beat all his ND teams. He just doesn’t know what it’s like to coach a better team.