Favorite team:LSU 
Location:On the road to Zion
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:188
Registered on:8/16/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I was at LSU during some of the Hallman era. The WKU game was a carbon copy of nearly every win.

re: BK is the reason

Posted by onestonedpony on 11/9/25 at 10:42 am to
BK is the reason, but it was poor roster management that did us in. OL, receivers, RBs are not playoff level. Lazy recruiting, lazy roster management=death in SEC. Nuss has his moments, and MVB was meh at State. I have no faith that he is the solution.

Getting ready for baseball
I recall one ESPN writer asking 'Did LSU settle for Les(s)?'
So Gov Crawdad is going to impose both the Pres and AD from a directional school on an R1 Flagship university which competes in the most elite athletic conference in the nation? Wow.
quote:

Posted on 10/30/25 at 3:27 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Uh, but that $20 million does NOT include booster money right? My brother and I have been trying to find out like hell if the $20 million is a CAP or just a guaranteed "base amount". If the latter, then your argument falls apart immediately since $20 million isn't the total. I'm ASKING if what I'm saying is right.


It’s not a hard cap — you’re right that booster/NIL collective money can still flow on top of the $20M. But that actually strengthens the point, it doesn’t break it.

The $20M is the baseline revenue-share obligation tied to media rights and structured compensation — meaning that’s the minimum guaranteed player-comp amount LSU has to plan for on its books.

Boosters can add whatever they want, sure. But whether the total ends up being $20M, $30M, or $40M+ when you factor in donors… the math still points the same direction:

You can’t keep paying one coach $10M+ plus pay the roster plus keep expanding support staff plus compete with SEC/NFL facilities and recruiting budgets forever.

Something has to give. And historically, when labor costs go up, executive salaries normalize, not the other way around.

So even if $20M is just the “floor,” the trend still holds — player pay rising = coaching pay pressure.

The bubble doesn’t pop because of the exact number.
It pops because the business model changes.


The 20 mil is a max, set to increase by 3% each year and to be reevaluated every three years. NIL portion (over $600) must be registered with NIL Go and clear the Deloitte auditors as being fair market value, or players will be ruled ineligible. This is supposed to stop paying big $ for No Show jobs. 2 unnamed schools have been accused of cheating in a story that broke first week of October, but NCAA, as usual, has not commented on it.
Political theater. Only 11% of LSU's total revenue comes from the state.
"The entire zeitgeist for a huge segment of young black men is anchored in the gang/gun/OG prison culture. I dont know why anyone would be surprised when something like this happens."

Code of the Street (Elijah Anderson).
Two from the 80s come to mind: 1988 25-0 Shutout of Texas A&M. 1987 31-13 shutdown of South Carolina in Gator Bowl.
Texas A&M. Never has so little been done with so much.

re: NIL - Do I have this right?

Posted by onestonedpony on 7/6/25 at 5:58 pm to
From what I've read, LSU gets $21.5 million to distribute as payment for NIL. The school plans to allocate 75% to football. LSU has 85 (I think) football scholarships. So

$21,500,000 X 75% ÷ 85 = $189,705 per scholarship player.

That's nuts! Please tell me where I'm wrong.

The math is good. One technicality- this is revenue sharing, not NIL. Players from any sport can get NIL but they have to use the NIL portal (NIL go) for any deal over $600 and have their deal authorized by Deloitte as 'fair market value.' Failure to use Deloitte/NIL go can lead to a suspension or ban by NCAA. No university has jurisdiction/responsibility over the NIL payments, only revenue sharing. Also, the 21.5 amount will grow 4% a year and be reevaluated at the end of 3 years.
They know they are never getting back here

Probably right. School payments and NIL will likely kill these G5 schools' chances.
Under the House settlement Deloitte will determine NIL true market value for all NCAA athletes. The definition of true market value is subject to interpretation. In real estate, true market value is whatever the buyer is willing to pay. In NIL, that opens a door for no limits or lawsuits which challenge imposed limits. Buckle up.

Rev sharing? My guess is coaches and ADs. May vary by school or possibly conferences will set procedures.
Why should Nuss be paid the same as a scholarship swimmer? No offense to the swimmer, but football is the only sport that matters. The NCAA holds university feet to the fire on the student side. Progress toward degree is required to remain eligible. 89% of LSU athletes graduate within 6 years. I trust NCAA more than politicians to sustain this focus (i.e. the current system is not broken on this issue). This legislation is reinventing the wheel with a different and non-market based distribution model and possibly less enforcement of academic rules.
I was at that game. I had a tortilla land on my head. Tech folks were tossing them onto the field from the upper decks.
I was living on the east coast at the time. I think this game went past mid-night. It was awesome. The second half of the 2000 Peach Bowl beat-down of GT was also pretty great

re: LSU Dog Names?

Posted by onestonedpony on 1/26/25 at 6:20 pm to
We had a dog named "Bourree" when we worked at LSU.
The TP was designed with the logic that coaches can leave but players cannot. However, coaches cannot leave without consequences, as there is usually some penalty for breaking the contract. Currently there is no punitive measure when players jump from one school to the next, so long as they are making adequate NCAA determined progress toward earning a degree.
They were putting the students on the 40 yrd line. Best seats, worst football.