- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
jread07
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 56 |
| Registered on: | 7/26/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Big 12-2-1+1/2+1-1+1/4
0
To the WV fans that don't happen to live in Texas, Do you even know anyone who went to Baylor, Texas Tech, OU, OSU, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, or TCU.
re: The Big East has learned nothing
Posted by jread07 on 10/10/11 at 2:06 am to Bubba Hotep
Getting Airforce in order to attract Army and Navy.
If they can get all three in the same conference it would be cool.
If they can get all three in the same conference it would be cool.
A&M and Arkansas have about the same rivalry with Mizzou. Not much. I say let Arkansas have them if they want them.
re: So do you they say Coke, Pop, or Soda in Missouri?
Posted by jread07 on 10/5/11 at 11:27 pm to smoked hog
Waiter: What do you want to drink?
Me: I'll have a coke.
Waiter: What kind?
Me: Dr. Pepper.
Me: I'll have a coke.
Waiter: What kind?
Me: Dr. Pepper.
re: The "No one from an existing member state" is BS IMO
Posted by jread07 on 9/28/11 at 3:59 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
I agree.
VTech
FSU
Clemson
.
.
Oklahoma
.
.
.
.
Mizzou
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
WV
Texas Tech
VTech
FSU
Clemson
.
.
Oklahoma
.
.
.
.
Mizzou
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
WV
Texas Tech
I do think that if Dodds and Powers will not schedule A&M in any sport that all SEC schools should return the favor.
Now that each school will be playing a Texas team during conference play there should be no reason to give the longhons another legit game.
Looking at you Ole Miss. :cheers:
Now that each school will be playing a Texas team during conference play there should be no reason to give the longhons another legit game.
Looking at you Ole Miss. :cheers:
re: Texas vs. Texas A&M - Rivalry Game
Posted by jread07 on 9/26/11 at 8:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
if aTm is smart, they will stop playing Texas
:dope:
I guess that makes you and Dodds a dumbass for wanting to cancel it.
Should they get AQ Status? Yes
However, I think an undefeated Big 12-2-1 should get passed up by a 1 loss SEC, B1G and PAC for the MNC.
However, I think an undefeated Big 12-2-1 should get passed up by a 1 loss SEC, B1G and PAC for the MNC.
re: Where does Aggie land start and end?
Posted by jread07 on 9/22/11 at 10:27 pm to LSU GrandDad
re: A&M "Sobering Up?"
Posted by jread07 on 9/20/11 at 3:28 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
Chicken can we ban drunk? He does nothing but troll
I second the Motion. All in Favor :dude:
re: A&M "Sobering Up?"
Posted by jread07 on 9/20/11 at 2:38 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
jason_cook Jason Cook @
@ChuckCarltonDMN Texas A&M has made our intentions perfectly clear. We do not intend to be a member of the Big 12 past this season.
Look at me. I can post twitter post as well. :bow:
@ChuckCarltonDMN Texas A&M has made our intentions perfectly clear. We do not intend to be a member of the Big 12 past this season.
Look at me. I can post twitter post as well. :bow:
re: A&M "Sobering Up?"
Posted by jread07 on 9/20/11 at 2:27 pm to Chad504boy
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
:bwahaha: :bwahaha: :bwahaha:
Nope...Still Drunk on the SEC
:cheers:
:bwahaha: :bwahaha: :bwahaha:
Nope...Still Drunk on the SEC
:cheers:
2011 beginning of super conferences but not the end
Posted by jread07 on 9/20/11 at 10:15 am
Here is how I see the Realignment of 2011 ending up.
ACC:
The ACC has now added Syracuse and Pitt, as well as, increase their exit fees in order to try and prevent any teams from leaving. Last year there was a strong feeling that Pitt would never be added to the B1G as it is the same geographical area as Penn State. As opposed to Rutgers, Kansas, and even Mizzou who feel they still might have a shot at the B1G. For 2011 realignment I believe the ACC is done at 14.
B1G:
The big made a grab last year in Nebraska but stopped. This year there has been no noise coming for the Midwest. I believe the B1G is still waiting on Notre Dame and doesn’t want to make a move until the Catholics join. So during 2011 The B1G stays at 12.
PAC:
The Pac has or will offer OU, OSU, Tech and the Longhorns. OU and OSU will accept. Tech will want to accept but the longhorns will not. The Pac will not accept Tech not because it doesn’t want them but because it doesn’t want an odd number of teams. Remember back to last year how quickly Utah was added in order to get to 12. The PAC will not want any other team other than the longhorns for #16. Therefore the Pac will be done with #14 for the 2011 realignment.
SEC:
The SEC will add A&M this year but they are not thrilled by any of the #14 options that are currently out there. The SEC is not going to act as the PAC did and just add a team for the sake of being even. The SEC will wait for Virginia Tech to realize that they are back in the same “Big East” conference they left in 2004. The SEC will add only A&M and stay at 13.
Big East/Big 12
The Big Merger will take place.
(East)
West Virginia
Louisville
Rutgers
South Florida
Connecticut
Cincinnati
(West)
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Texas Tech
(Non Football)
Longhorns
Notre Dame
This conference will be formed for one reason, in order to keep the AQ status through 2014. This is the beginning of super conferences but not the end. Just the end of the 2011 Drama.
5 AQ Confernces with Notre Dame, Longhorns, BYU, Army, and Navy as Indy
ACC:
The ACC has now added Syracuse and Pitt, as well as, increase their exit fees in order to try and prevent any teams from leaving. Last year there was a strong feeling that Pitt would never be added to the B1G as it is the same geographical area as Penn State. As opposed to Rutgers, Kansas, and even Mizzou who feel they still might have a shot at the B1G. For 2011 realignment I believe the ACC is done at 14.
B1G:
The big made a grab last year in Nebraska but stopped. This year there has been no noise coming for the Midwest. I believe the B1G is still waiting on Notre Dame and doesn’t want to make a move until the Catholics join. So during 2011 The B1G stays at 12.
PAC:
The Pac has or will offer OU, OSU, Tech and the Longhorns. OU and OSU will accept. Tech will want to accept but the longhorns will not. The Pac will not accept Tech not because it doesn’t want them but because it doesn’t want an odd number of teams. Remember back to last year how quickly Utah was added in order to get to 12. The PAC will not want any other team other than the longhorns for #16. Therefore the Pac will be done with #14 for the 2011 realignment.
SEC:
The SEC will add A&M this year but they are not thrilled by any of the #14 options that are currently out there. The SEC is not going to act as the PAC did and just add a team for the sake of being even. The SEC will wait for Virginia Tech to realize that they are back in the same “Big East” conference they left in 2004. The SEC will add only A&M and stay at 13.
Big East/Big 12
The Big Merger will take place.
(East)
West Virginia
Louisville
Rutgers
South Florida
Connecticut
Cincinnati
(West)
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Texas Tech
(Non Football)
Longhorns
Notre Dame
This conference will be formed for one reason, in order to keep the AQ status through 2014. This is the beginning of super conferences but not the end. Just the end of the 2011 Drama.
5 AQ Confernces with Notre Dame, Longhorns, BYU, Army, and Navy as Indy
re: Will Texas have any friends left?
Posted by jread07 on 9/19/11 at 7:22 pm to HooDooWitch
Baylor :dunno:
Loftin to BoR: We want to go to the SEC
BoR: You have been granted power
Boren to BoR: We want to go to the PAC
BoR: You have been granted power
Powers to BoR: I don't know what the hell we are going to do.
BoR: Come back to us when you do.
BoR: You have been granted power
Boren to BoR: We want to go to the PAC
BoR: You have been granted power
Powers to BoR: I don't know what the hell we are going to do.
BoR: Come back to us when you do.
Fine, I am only going to do this once. But in the future know that rebutting every dumbass thing you ever wrote is a waste of time.
The B1G conference is the once conference were Academia plays any type of role due to the CIC. The PAC Conference itself is not a highly academic conference. The Cal State University Systems, SC and Stanford all work together similarly to the B1G School’s CIC network. But that hasn’t been much help the remaining PAC school Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State, AZ, AZ State, Utah, and Colorado. And they want to dilute the PAC’s Prowess by bringing Tech and OSU.
But if this really all matter that much to them they wouldn’t be looking at the PAC at all. They would be looking ACC and B1G. Additionally the SEC > than the Big 12 in Ranking.
:banghead:
The B1G conference is the once conference were Academia plays any type of role due to the CIC. The PAC Conference itself is not a highly academic conference. The Cal State University Systems, SC and Stanford all work together similarly to the B1G School’s CIC network. But that hasn’t been much help the remaining PAC school Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State, AZ, AZ State, Utah, and Colorado. And they want to dilute the PAC’s Prowess by bringing Tech and OSU.
But if this really all matter that much to them they wouldn’t be looking at the PAC at all. They would be looking ACC and B1G. Additionally the SEC > than the Big 12 in Ranking.
:banghead:
re: Inquiring Minds Ask, "Why no Texas/OU to SEC?"
Posted by jread07 on 9/19/11 at 5:02 pm to Cajun Revolution
Don't Mind the Drunk he is just the Longhorn Village Idiot.
:banghead:
:banghead:
Top 10
SEC
ACC
B1G
Big 12
PAC
Big East
SEC
ACC
B1G
Big 12
PAC
Big East
Popular
35
