AustinTigah

This piece spells it out and it's dead-on accurate. LINK

quote:

---

It looks haphazard at times, but it can’t be entirely by accident. Miles is now 82-19 at LSU, one percentage point back of Urban Meyer for the second-best career winning percentage in SEC history. His team will go into November with one or fewer losses for the sixth time in eight seasons.

---

Yes, it's ugly, it's inconsistent, and it's frustrating to watch. But who can argue our success (i.e. that we *WIN*) and the fact that after EIGHT YEARS it's not luck...

Any arguments out there that aren't contained in this article?

LINK
LINK

Worst post evah.

(see user name, then find something else worth spending your time posting about)

Over and over... "ESPN hates LSU and has an Alabama agenda".

How about this article promoting a split NC if Bama wins? ESPN LINK

It's the only major news outlet with that story (CNNSI, CBS, College Football News, Sporting News, etc, etc, etc.) and it couldn't be more of a knock on the Gumps.

Read. Think. Chill.

”Is Ray Guy still in the running for the Brad Wing award?” — Dean Jens

:bow: :lol:

LINK

LINK

Bama's 11 wins included only THREE (3) teams with a winning record. (no, we don't count FCS Georgia Southern).

Case closed.

quote:

---

This past weekend has really pissed some of your corndogs off hasn't it?

---

Nope. All good here. Incredible weekend!

Just proving that Weeden, Wilson, Keenum, and others have put up more impressive REAL stats than easy punch ins.

Can't you guys refute a statistical statement without BS arguments? I grew up in Alabama and know most of you aren't good with numbers and such. But try.

3, 2, 1 ... another corndog joke, comment about a rematch, or subjective argument coming NOW!

Wow. 7 of 20 (35%) is exactly what I'm saying. And that doesn't count other short runs.

EDITED TO ADD: 10 of 20 (50%!!!) less than 5 yards. Wow again.

Most FBS backs could punch in 7 TDs from 2 yards behind a top class O-line.

Back out 7 "easy" TDs and 13 isn't Heisman worthy.

The point being- when you have a back you're trying to get to New York, you give him every 2 yard punch possible to pad the stats. Let's face it - Bama has dominated most opponents... Don't tell me they NEEDED Richardson on those punch ins. Lacy or a third string back could have done it.

Talking TD runs. Bamers - don't react emotionally. 20 TDs is great. But with an incredible O-line like Bama has, every single one of our backs could punch it in for 1-2 yards.

And yes... he gains a lot of yards on long runs. But let's not name him a Heisman finalist just by saying he now has more TD runs than Ingram.

Seriously looking for stats on length of his TD runs.

I know kicks are from the 30 these days, but how can we find such an incredible punter... but almost never hit a touchback?

Anyone have our touchback stats vs. the rest of the FBS?

So is it safe to say, we're undefeated, #1, and on the brink of another BCSNCG because:

A) Our D is incredible
B) We win the turn-over battle
C) We have exceptional special teams
D) And our O is JUST good enough to score on their own PLUS capitalize on the b) turn-overs and c) special teams field position.

Essentially, our offense is average but scores points due to B) and C)?

Good summary?