IceTea20

Fine. I'll bite. I don't like any of them either but the faux outrage over THESE strikes when we know these people pose an actual DIRECT threat to the US homeland vs some supposed terrorist in another sovereign country on the other side of the globe is apples and oranges. If the left hated it so much we might have been able to change the law during Obama. So this whole outrage against Hegseth/Trump over this is pure bat guano.

That said....as a former CG officer..... I wish they would wait til these tools are near our contiguous zone (24 miles), warn them over the radio and wait for them to cross that line. Then the second they do declare them stateless pirates under UNCLOS and blow them out the water. It can be more easily couched as direct threat to the homeland, US sovereignty and violations of US narco/customs laws and military actions were in its defense. Putting more coasties lives at risk trying to chasing down these criminals is risky business. Too many get hurt or killed that never makes the news cycle.

Doing this on the "high seas" even outside our EEZ is the US still trying to be the world police which the majority of Americans are opposed to.

I retired in 22' and was hoping to stay here. I'm second guessing that now.

GROK is better.

It ain't just the Somali's doing this. All the illegals are as well. Lots of money flowing back to Central and South America. They are all bleeding the USA dry and propping up their own home countries in the process.

If you have any cheap TEMU electronics or cell phone charger "blocks" start with removing those first.

I'm a RE agent and sit alot of home inspections. When we have problems testing those breakers its almost always one of those two things on newer homes.

Good luck!

Well just "spend" our way out of the problem. People keep voting for it.

Sears checked all the "boxes" but she was a horrible candidate. She sank the whole ticket. I'm sorry but it's true.

Hire American. Problem solved. Go home illegals!

quote:

---

The lady didnt take time to think about whether or not he was in a legal or non legal passing zone as she drove headfirst into traffic.

It wasnt part of her decision making process so you cant pretend she wouldve acted differently if it had been a legal passing zone.

---

Great info.

I find it difficult to draw conclusions about what was going on in her head based on what the "black box" says she was doing. People do weird things when placed in these snap decision scenarios. It seems alot comes down to what was going through her head and if her explanation holds up to scrutiny in court.

Thanks for sharing and explaining.

quote:

---

A lot of frickery on both sides at the expense of KL….
The funyon hoe should be just as responsible as KL…..

---

Honest question. Are we trying to assert that funyon would have crashed even if KL had not been there? That seems to be the point of the defense and applying common sense doesn't make sense to me. I get that she wasn't paying attention etc etc but why would she turn into oncoming traffic if not pannicked by seeing a car speeding toward her head on. Honestly trying to understand.

Final Boss is right. I don't think Charlie ever attempted an HBCU, did he?