gamefaceheehaw

If Mo had a pick for each game he has left, does he even pop into the top 3?

quote:

---

Jet12

---

We all know you poop on the bus :moon: :yack:

But what im saying is do we base on if a conference is good enough by one year or even the past few years? Or what we predict will happen? I think they are qualified for an AQ spot. Suddenly they will deserve it once they get TCU? im a huge tcu fan and i think theyre really good no doubt but is that really the team that will boost them to that height? This is also not biased towards lsu either, the question is just does having a bad year as a conference make them not good enough to have an aq spot? Theyve had teams like Louisville, Pitt, USF Rutgers and Cincy successful in past years. And teams like UCONN and West Va doing great this year. Saying theyre not good enough for an aq spot is like saying they belong in a conference like the WAC or MWC or worse. Wouldnt that just be great if instead of hearing all of this stuff about Boise and TCU, we hear it about Boise, TCU, Pitt, Louisville, Cincy, UCONN, USF and WEST VIRGINIA?! Cmon guys, be realistic here. What yall are saying is we should just take Ole Miss, Tennessee, UCLA, Cal, Michigan, Penn St, and Texas out and put em in one sucky conference because they had a bad year. The Big East CAN be dominant. So lets just take away their aq spot not becuas ethey werent this year? Thats rediculous

Okay, so me and my friend were talking about TCU and how they are going to the Big East which came to how strong the Big East is. He seems to think that without TCU,the Big East doesnt deserve a AQ spot in the BCS picture. My argument is that just because they have had an off year and average past couple of years, doesnt mean they shouldnt be considered for an AQ spot. But over the past like 7 years, there have been some dominant Big East schools and just because theres no ranked teams in the top 25 by them, doesnt mean they arent a big conference that deserves a bid. We know technically they cant lose their AQ spot but his argument is if they deserve it. Think about this...If it was the end of the '07 season, would you be thinking of dropping their bid? Do off years really result in not deserving that bid? You tell me.

So my question to everyone- Does the Big East deserve a bid even without TCU?




...Id also like to note that this is the same guy im arguing with about this...

LINK

He also feels that if you have a small lead in the 4th quarter of a college football game, you should kick the onside kick anyways because "you have a chance to get the ball back" hahahhahaha. Just another note to think about.

just found out that we have the most active players with 59.

im actually totally against a name, but that mr. lsu guy pushed it, and now its happening, so i dont wanna get stuck with a gay name like skip screwballs

any one have ideas for a name for the student section???

Im pretty sure it was a saxophone quartet. Saxophone = woodwind and Quartet = 4