- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
kjheath1
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 15 |
| Registered on: | 1/14/2010 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Bank On Yourself
Posted by kjheath1 on 4/7/10 at 10:54 am to kingfish25
It is not a scam, unless you actually pay a $3500 up front fee to get it set up. The key to the program, is setting it up through the right insurance company which provides all the features which make it work so effectively. Many financially saavy people, and high net worth individuals understand the benefits of this type of "plan" and take advantage of it, sometimes even have several of them in place. To get a more detailed look at how it works, read the book "Bank on Yourself" by Pamela Yellan. I have many clients who are taking advantage of the plan, and I have not once charged them an upfront fee. Before everyone jumps on this reply, saying that its life insurance, so a commission is made (which it is, as with just about everything), the design of the plan is overfunding, which actually minimizes the commissions made. If you are serious about it, feel free to email me, and I can explain it in more detail, and I even have a few copies of the book.
re: what happens with the money you’ve paid?
Posted by kjheath1 on 3/11/10 at 8:57 am to Alan Chavez
Again. That's why its so inexpensive. It serves its purpose if you die, thats it. Depending on your situation, it may or may not be the best option. If you are concerned about "wasting" your money, with whole life, you build cash value and the death benefit, meaning, at some point in life, you will get your premiums back plus some, whether its through the death benefit, or you can access is through the cash value.
Again, before you do anything, sit down with an agent who can answer your questions specific to YOUR scenario. There isn't a "cookie cutter" answer to anyones situation.
Again, before you do anything, sit down with an agent who can answer your questions specific to YOUR scenario. There isn't a "cookie cutter" answer to anyones situation.
re: Best investment vehicle for minor children
Posted by kjheath1 on 3/11/10 at 8:50 am to Count Chocula
I over fund a whole life policy on each of my kids for college savings. You are correct, you wouldn't want them to MEC, so you set it up correctly so it won't. There is nothing wrong with 529 plans, but they HAVE to be used for college expenses. In a realistic world, there are MANY MANY things that could effect them needing college funding. Overfunding a permanent policy provides plenty of tax free, non penalizable money that I/they can access with no limitations. If not needed for college, they will be able to use it for down payment on house, wedding, etc.
re: Difference between, Whole, Term, Variable and Universal Life Insu
Posted by kjheath1 on 3/11/10 at 8:38 am to Alan Chavez
its suprising that the agent woudn't discuss the differences with you. It's not possible to say which is "better" without knowing your situation. If you want the least expensive policy for the most coverage, term would be the way to go. If you want to have a permanent coverage which you could utilize to supplement your retirement with, whole life would be better. If you want more of a permanent term insurance, universal life would be the answer. And if you want to "buy term invest the rest" all in one policy, thats where variable universal would come into play. I would sit down with an agent who would discuss how all of them work, and help YOU determine which fits YOUR situation best.
Correct. There is a limit. Once your income exceeds that limit, the Roth is still there, you jsut can't contribute anymore. The limit still aplies if you contribute to a traditional, you can't convert to a Roth. There are other options out there for you to consider, depending on what you are trying to accomplish.
re: Life Insurance
Posted by kjheath1 on 2/26/10 at 12:31 pm to Alan Chavez
Definitely. You may need the option later in life, you may not. But make sure the option is there. In regards to all the bs going both ways on this thread, find a reputable company, and learn about each, and the benefits of being ABLE to convert if needed.
Someone mentioned if they had a gazillion dollars in the bank, they wouldn't need life insurance. Heres my question to that...the estate tax on a gazillion dollars is 45% of a gazillion. If you wanted to get be able to transfer your gazillion to the family, rather than Uncle Sam, how would you do it? The only real solution, and a huge part of Estate planning, involves permanent life insurance. Its wealth transfer solutions.
Let me ask another question, if your auto insurance, could "grow", give you benefits, and eventually it would be paid off (meaning you could keep the insurance, but could stop paying for it), would you pay more for it than standard auto insurance?
Someone mentioned if they had a gazillion dollars in the bank, they wouldn't need life insurance. Heres my question to that...the estate tax on a gazillion dollars is 45% of a gazillion. If you wanted to get be able to transfer your gazillion to the family, rather than Uncle Sam, how would you do it? The only real solution, and a huge part of Estate planning, involves permanent life insurance. Its wealth transfer solutions.
Let me ask another question, if your auto insurance, could "grow", give you benefits, and eventually it would be paid off (meaning you could keep the insurance, but could stop paying for it), would you pay more for it than standard auto insurance?
Because of different ratings, no one will be able to give you an exact amount until you go through underwriting. Since you are looking at substantial difference in premiums between 20 and 30 year term, why not look into a universal life policy. Essentially, it can be a lifetime term policy.
Which is not a horrible idea. However, I would look into annuities over cd's. 2 reasons, higher rate of return, and tax deferral.
quote:
Upon you death, they pay the face value of the policy, not the face value + the investment balance. The investment portion dies with you
Correct. However, the death benefit has grown as well as the cash value, and, it has grown at a higher rate than the cash value, so, in most cases, the death benefit would pay out MORE than the original death benefit plus the cash value (investment part, as you referred to it).
quote:
a 70 year old male can still purchase 20 year level term
From what company? Most companies will not sell any term policy that wil extend past the age of 70...maybe 80. So, as far as I know, a 70 year old could purchase 10 year term, but not 20.
Read the fine print...you die and they KEEP your investment??? That makes no sense. If you were to die, you would get paid out the death benefit...they don't KEEP it!
Whoooaaaa...
The last thing I meant to imply is that I like Dave Ramsey. I agree, people treat him like a God, and his advice equates to "don't eat, and you won't get fat". It's quite entertaining to see people follow his advice as if they are in a trance. Although some of his advice has merit, much of it is garbage.
One of the disadvantages of a 529, is that there are many variables which will nullify the tax advantages of it. For example, what if the child doesn't go to college, or gets a full ride. Yes, you get tax deduction now, but will have to pay the taxes upon withdrawal. Of course, no one can be sure, but do you think taxes will be higher or lower in future years?!
The reason I brought up Ramsey, was because it entertains me how many people recite his advice on how good something is (when it usually isn't), and treat it like the holy word, but no one mentions it when someone asks about something that Ramsey doesn't really care for.
The last thing I meant to imply is that I like Dave Ramsey. I agree, people treat him like a God, and his advice equates to "don't eat, and you won't get fat". It's quite entertaining to see people follow his advice as if they are in a trance. Although some of his advice has merit, much of it is garbage.
One of the disadvantages of a 529, is that there are many variables which will nullify the tax advantages of it. For example, what if the child doesn't go to college, or gets a full ride. Yes, you get tax deduction now, but will have to pay the taxes upon withdrawal. Of course, no one can be sure, but do you think taxes will be higher or lower in future years?!
The reason I brought up Ramsey, was because it entertains me how many people recite his advice on how good something is (when it usually isn't), and treat it like the holy word, but no one mentions it when someone asks about something that Ramsey doesn't really care for.
There are places you can put the extra 7% above what your employee is matching. Typically, the biggest benefit of 401k is the company match. Putting more than the match may result in losing some of your gains to taxes.
In case anyone was wondering, Dave Ramsey isn't a big fan of 529's
That is a great company. They are a mutual company. It is a great point that people need to research more than just the premium. Although premium makes a difference, you do get what you pay for. Mutual insurance companies are rock solid, always have been, always will be. Even Dave Ramsey has come out and made that point. Amazing that he would ever acknowledge how important that is, but he did. It was impossible for him not to in lieu of the recent financial crisis.
Popular
1











