Favorite team:Texas 
Location:Logansport
Biography:
Interests:hunting, fishing
Occupation:welder
Number of Posts:90
Registered on:11/24/2008
Online Status: 

Recent Posts

Message
Listen to how fricking stupid yall coonasses are. Its almost too funny to even read that shite. Coached inferior talent at Auburn and gave mighty LSU fits. Your right, I'll see. Wait til he has several more years at Texas with the same system and we will beat LSU 8-5 arse every year. Get over the fact yall won the NC last year. You won too many close games on fluke calls and plays, you wont ever be that lucky or good again. 12-1 is a helluva lot better than 8-5 and the records should be similar next year.

re: after watching the fiesta bowl

Posted by Oakflat on 1/5/09 at 11:27 pm to
"Texas is a little better than GT"

lol, and Ohio State of 08 is much better than LSU of 08
Muschamp's overrated? He's not near the coordinator Chavis is is he? Give me a fricking break, LSU would cum themselves if he were yalls DC.
Does this solve any defensive problems. Hell no, but its good to be optomistic.
Preseason 16-18

Postseason 13-15

Will have at least 3 losses next year as the QB situation is far from being solved.
Well I do have at least a high school education from another state other than LA. Yall are the 49th worst public education state in America, you tell me who's the stupid frick.

Your right, the defense should limit the time of possession for the other team, but its really hard when you have to overcome come what, 20+ int's. Your offense has to also keep possession to give the defense a breather and sustain a drive instead of int, punt, punt, int.

The defense no doubt had a bad year, but if you can look at the season in review and say the offense was just as shitty and cost you two SEC games you are a complete ignorant fool. If you ask me the OC did no favors to the shitty QB production by not running the ball more effectively, and helping the young QB out with more efficient passes.

re: JJ proved this season was a fluke

Posted by Oakflat on 1/4/09 at 12:14 pm to
In 2007 during the National Championship run, if LSU would have had the same QB production as this year they would have been a 4 or 5 loss team then too.

Football is a team sport and just relying on the defense too win you games in the best conference their is because your offense cant sustain drives, is inconsistent, and turns the ball over more than anyone else, is bullshite. Anyone that know anything about football knows that.

If next year the QB play dont get any better, brace yourself for another 4-5 loss year.

re: JJ proved this season was a fluke

Posted by Oakflat on 1/4/09 at 12:10 pm to
Its obvious most of you ignorant frickers never played a down of football at least not very competitive football. I know damn good and well that most on here dont have a very high football IQ or just a very high IQ in general.

Who in the world could LSU had of had as a DC and beat Florida, Ole Miss, Alabama, or Georgia.

Florida and Ole Miss were better, bottom line.
Alabama and Georgia were aided by pick 6's and other turnovers that gave them short fields and just flat out demoralize a defense.

I didn't play at the D1 level, I did however play at the D1-AA level at SFA, and have played plenty of football to know that the offense was the main problem of the defenses.

Florida hammered their asses, and would have no matter who the DC would have been. The Arkansas game was the only game where I thought you can single out the Defense and point the blame at them. Regardless of what King Joey says (he may need to go back and watch the game) Georgia was given 17 points by the Offense, and LSU lost by 14, whats so fricking hard to figure out.

When the defense just gets a stop, or gives up a score and is right back on the field (on a short field) you cant overcome that. It gets worse when they are on the bench and watch the other team run back an interception.

re: Future Champs??

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 11:21 pm to
Did King Joey say Miles' ability to maintain an elite level program. Is that what you call a 8-5 record. That's pretty funny. We will see if this year was a fluke, and if yall are better than Alabama, Ole Miss, Georgia, and Florida, or if its just wishful thinking.

re: JJ proved this season was a fluke

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 11:11 pm to
Yeah King Joey the offense had nothing to do with the loss to Georgia did it. Scored 38 but gave up 17. Got beat by 14. Sounds like the offense cost you that game. You got it backwards.

re: JJ proved this season was a fluke

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 11:08 pm to
All that ralling you said J Lee did makes it sound like you think he had a good year. Thats pretty funny. Get off his nuts and see the truth that QB play was the biggest problem of the season. The problem with you fricking coonasses is that yall are too dumb to see past what is obvious.

"We are giving up alot of points, so it must be the defense." Thats all yall see and get from the internet.

Forget about 6 or 7 pick 6's, 12 other interceptions at costly times, inability to sustain drives that keep a tired defense on the field.

You saw what good QB play was in the bowl game, all of J Lee's miracle comebacks you speak of were not good QB play. Playing good 2 drives a game don't get it in the SEC. You take the performance by the QB in the bowl game and put it in any other game of the year and you lose 2 games instead of 5.

Offensive play has to do as much with momemtem and the way the defense than anything. Do you think Mallory and Peveto just learned how to coach the 5 weeks they had off, doubt it.

I'm sure Chavis will do wonders and yall will go undefeated next year. Give him the same QB play and you will be bitching about him next year.

re: LSU or Ole Miss in 2009

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 10:56 pm to
No matter how you slice it the offense gave up 17 to Georgia. If the offense dont give them 17 points LSU wins the game.

If you cant see that the offense (QB play) was the biggest problem on the year, and for the defense you are just a complete ignorant coonass.

Florida and Ole Miss were obviously better than LSU this year and no matter who was the DC would have lost those two games.

The offense gave Georgia and Alabama the games, and the only loss where the defense was the biggest culprit was Arkansas. You cant leave your D on the field all game long and expect them to hold teams to nothing. Yeah bring up the Georgia game again, the offense didn't do anything but give up two of the touchdowns and gave them field position inside the 15 and the D held them to a field goal.

You saw what the D could do with good QB play and a little mojo in the bowl game. You are always on the D about not playing inspired, how can you when you have sudden changes after an int. (around 22 on the year) and the offense giving up scores instead of scoring (7 times). You make a stop, wham, back on the field. Give up a score, wham, back on the field b/c of an int.

Solid QB play would have been a 10 win season.

If you think Chavis will do any better in the same situation with the same schedule, dream on dumbfrick.

re: LSU or Ole Miss in 2009

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 9:33 pm to
The offense was no better than the defense and was alot of the problem. They haven't fixed all the problem or they would get rid of the QB coach, or o-line coach.

Blaming it all on the defense is the easy thing to do, if you cant see the offense was just a big a problem and the QB situation was the main reason you lost 5 games, you are just fricking dumb, or delusional.

re: JJ proved this season was a fluke

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 9:08 pm to
If you dumbfricks think Chavis is the savior to the program yall are in for a rude awakening. I bet he goes to bed praying for a better QB to emerge for next year or yall will be wanting his job too.
"Didn't buy into the Co-DC scheme" WHAT?

It was the same scheme Pelini used. And for anyone to say the defense is suppose to pick up the slack for a young QB, is completely full of shite or just fricking retarded.

You cant fault the defense for giving up points on a short field, and they are not responsible for pick 6's. When you are constantly on the field and playing on a short field its makes your job tough no matter who you are or who your coaches are.

In the Georgia they were not responsible for 17 of the points that Georgia scored (2 pick 6's, and another drive started inside the 10 that they held to a FG). The Alabama game was the same way. If LSU had consistent QB play throughout the year they would be a 10 win team and there would be no coaching changes.

Do you think they just learned to coach and gameplan in the month of December before the bowl game. I doubt it. It goes to show you that the QB is hands down the most important position in football and with a bad one it makes it awefully hard to win. The offense was just as bad as the Defense or worse, but its the defenses fault. Shut the frick up.

re: LSU or Ole Miss in 2009

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 4:13 pm to
LSU needs to improve alot in alot of areas before they can claim the SEC West.
I wonder, did the defensive coaches just learn how to game plan and coach in the past month? I think not. Its amazing what good QB play will do for a team. I'm guessing that if they had quality QB play all year long they would have been a 10 win team and the DC's would still be there. Anybody that knows shite about football knows that, except some you the dumbasses on this board. Chavis better hope he gets good QB play or his defense will be no better.

re: A Message For Pete Carol

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 3:32 pm to
They also had the greatest college football team of all time in 2005 according to the media and experts, until TEXAS beat that arse.

re: LSU or Ole Miss in 2009

Posted by Oakflat on 1/3/09 at 9:01 am to
I'll go with OLE MIss simply because of better and more experienced QB play.

re: why are the players

Posted by Oakflat on 1/1/09 at 11:51 pm to
your full of shite King Joey, they threw 3 int.
And how in the frick did the offense perform at an o.k. level by giving up 14 points. Give me a fricking break.

re: why are the players

Posted by Oakflat on 1/1/09 at 11:40 pm to
The defense didn't give up 50+ against Georgia. The offense gave up 14 and let Georgia start a drive inside the 15 on another score.

Truth is no matter who the DC's would have been against Florida, Georgia, and Alabama yall would have been beat. Florida was better, and the offense handed the other two the game. So dont start that shite about the defense gave up 50 on Georgia.

Better QB play during the year and you would be 10-3 maybe 11-2 and the DC's would still be there.

I feel sorry for the next DC if he comes in and gets his arse waxed by Florida, Georgia, Ole Miss and Alabama next year. I'm sure he'll be run off too no matter whether the offense pisses a drop or not.