- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
PetTiger
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | The Northshore |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 174 |
| Registered on: | 7/1/2008 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
It is an unprotected pick so there is no reason for them to pick him if they don't want him. And the over slot penalty is if they go over their total pool amount for the top 10 rounds, not if they go over on a certain pick.
I never said they didn't want him. I said the don't REALLY want him, like they don't have to have this guy. They targeted pitching, CF & middle infielders in this draft according to their GM. He was the best available for what they were looking for. If they absolutely had to have him, they would have drafted him as their #1, which was after most mocks had him going anyway.
Also, if they sign him for $2.5-mm then they have to take the $1.2-mm that they pay over slot for him out of the other slots they have. If they don't pay the other picks slot, some won't sign. That will make the $1.2-mm extra (already ~20% over their total bonus pool) for Gallo a higher percent of the total since they lose the bonus money for an unsigned pick.
So if the Rangers sign all picks, pay slot and give Gallo $2.5-mm, they will forfeit 2-first round draft picks and have to pay a $900k tax. Either way, I think he takes the $1.3-mm and goes...
Doubtful they will even approach $2.5-mm... I wouldn't expect him to get near $1.4-mm unless they really want him. Which I am betting they don't since they picked him up with their 2nd pick. It was likely a best available type pick.
LINK
quote:
Exceed slot by anything more than 5 percent, and then the real penalties kick in, starting with the loss of a first-round pick in the next draft. They get precipitously steeper from there, with an overage of more than 15 percent resulting in the loss of two first-round picks.
LINK
I didn't know Ford was missing his left thumb! :lol:
re: All this talk about markets is misguided
Posted by PetTiger on 8/16/11 at 2:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
how does TAMU get the SEC interest in the Big East markets?
They don't. I never said they do. I said adding TAMU would increase the viewing market (population) by 42% and that I would rather watch a TAMU game over a WVU game. The key word is I... The main argument with the regions I made was that adding FSU would be worth more due to its national following than adding Missouri to get the entire Missouri market.
quote:
why does the market size matter if few people in those huge markets watch CFB?
Because during the contract negotiations, it is impossible to know the ratings. The only thing you can do is look at potential. The better the product (SEC games) in a larger market will project better. Again, THIS IS INSIDE OF A MARKET THAT DOESN'T HAVE A GAME AT THAT SAME TIME SLOT. It may only happen a handful of times a year, but that time in the year is up for grabs. Wouldn't you rather get it than someone else. If you have Missouri in that slot, the SEC probably doesn't gain anything. FSU is a different story.
quote:
but i was discsusing the "market impact on regional games" for TAMU (since we don't know the 2nd team)
And my original post you questioned was directed at someone else discussing how adding FSU would not provide much gain in TV revenue over say a Missouri...
quote:
compelling or not, the games will still likely come down to region
I completely agree, but the region in the given example typically doesn't have a regional game to televise at that time slot. You asked for an example and I provided one that happens weekly.
quote:
esp in vastly foreign markets this expansion won't touch (west coast, upper east coast)
I disagree. Again, look at the example. It makes sense to me. Maybe I am missing something...
quote:
i don't think ESPN will like CBS pushing for more night games, as that will cut into the ESPN bottom line
Totally agree, but CBS is planning on adding a second primetime SEC game this year. It will definitely cut into the ESPN telecast in primetime on ABC.
quote:
but on saturdays, there are only so many games.
Couldn't agree more. However, would you agree within that finite number of slots there is competition between the conferences to get their games on TV?
quote:
then at least 1 SEC at night (on ESPN/2), with 2 often. this compliments the CBS day game.
Aren't there typically 3 SEC games on ESPN networks typically? There is the 6:45 time slot on ESPN, a 7:45 time slot on ESPN 2 and isn't there a 6:30 time slot on ESPN U that usually show SEC games?
Isn't it safe to say that adding a national brand (FSU) is better than Missouri and to a lesser degree VaTech? I would think that would give you more bargaining power when the time came to negotiate. With that type of addition, it is far more likely to have compelling match-ups that will draw larger TV shares with higher profile universities.
re: All this talk about markets is misguided
Posted by PetTiger on 8/16/11 at 1:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
ABC is not a subsidiary of ESPN
Correct! ABC owns ESPN. All ABC CFB broadcasts are ESPN productions, hence the name "ESPN on ABC", making it an ESPN broadcast. I will try to be more literal next time.
quote:
so we'll gain share in the Big East, MAC, and/or WAC regional market? VICTORY!
You're right because the Big East has no large TV markets within its footprint. :rolleyes:
quote:
only one of those would even possibly apply, and that's possibly gaining broadcast of the WAC region for a TAMU game here or there. and i don't think those regions overlap
The argument was FSU would draw more national interest over the potential addition of a team outside the current SEC footprint, like VaTech or Missouri :yack: . This regional argument would obviously only apply when a specific market (say the West Coast) didn't have a compelling match-up involving regional teams (Pac-10), like for instance the 11-am game (SEC TV or Big 10 game). In that time slot FSU (potential SEC TV game with Ole Miss) has the potential to draw more viewers in Cali than Michigan (another team that could have an 11-am game on the same day v. Illinois). If you substitute Missouri for FSU, then the SEC TV game would have almost no shot versus the draw of Michigan (I realize the program is down, but it is a national brand). I also assume that there would be a team from the east (Boston College) that would take the Mid-Atlantic & New England regions during that time slot. The same logic would apply for this region as well.
quote:
ESPNRegional is a small piece of the pie
what are some examples of ESPNRegional games?
This applies to all SEC TV games, which can be sold outside of the ESPN networks. Typically it would also apply to 11-am games.
The majority of SEC games are broadcast on ESPN's GamePlan. Adding a national brand name school to the conference might bump one more league game to ESPN's cable networks (as opposed to premium)each week. That would mean more ad dollars sold for SEC time slots; therefore, the potential value would be higher when a new TV contract for 2nd tier rights is negotiated.
re: All this talk about markets is misguided
Posted by PetTiger on 8/16/11 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
link me to an example of ESPN showing regional options, please
ESPN 2011 CFB Game Schedule
See the fourth bullet in the "College Football on Additional ESPN Platforms" section.
Also, see this link as an example from last year. While this shows the majority of the games reverse simulcast on ABC & ESPN. Like you mentioned...
quote:
ABC does regional broadcasts
which is an ESPN broadcast... So...
quote:
The "regional games" that ESPN shows are only shown within the geographic area of the conference.
still applies.
On another note, how did parts of upstate NY and eastern Massachusetts get lumped into the southeastern US region?
re: All this talk about markets is misguided
Posted by PetTiger on 8/15/11 at 9:40 am to Indiana Tiger
quote:
The idea that we would be limited on games broadcast on ESPN/CBS to what the SEC has today is silly.
Absolutely. The misconception is that ESPN will show ACC or Big East games out of region in time slots where they could get a larger market share out of region with SEC games. I'm not saying this will always be the case, but if I lived in Nevada, I would much rather watch a 4:00-pm CT game with Georgia v. TAMU than WVU v. BC. Just saying.
This is also the case with adding FSU or someone with a larger national following. Not Mizzou...
quote:
The idea of adding media markets is a little strange in that CBS/ESPN broadcast nationally. There aren't any media markets for SEC to expand into that don't already have CBS/ESPN.
Not all of the SEC games are shown nationally on ESPN. This is where adding the new markets comes into play. The "regional games" that ESPN shows are only shown within the geographic area of the conference. With the addition of TAMU, the region size increases within Texas (42% of current SEC population). The ad dollars would be sold, as would the contract for rights, on potential viewership.
The addition of FSU increases the likelihood of ESPN showing a "regional game" in the larger media markets with FSU fans. This would get SEC "regional games" broadcast in LA and NYC when given a choice over OU and Baylor where as now, if State & Kentucky are playing are playing, ESPN will show the OU v. Baylor game 4 out of 5 times. If it was FSU and Vandy, there might be a reason to show that game on the east coast as opposed to the OU game.
quote:
I graduated back in 2001 and they couldn't handle West Monroe, Evangel, or Shaw.
The team for the 2000 football season was one of the worst in recent memory. It was the year after one of the better senior classes as a group went through. The senior class that graduated in 2001 was small numbers wise. Plus, there was a lack in athleticism in that class across the board. No D1 signees from that class that I remember. This was the season where DW lost his first season opener.
Also, I am pretty sure this was also during the time that Shaw was caught for paying players... Just saying since they are specifically mentioned above.
re: Baseball: Pepperdine 1 @ LSU 8, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 3/4/10 at 8:39 pm to ForeverLSU02
Did they say why Paxton quit?
re: Baseball: Pepperdine 1 @ LSU 8, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 3/4/10 at 7:32 pm to HeauxBeaux
Yeah, but I can't find anything better with all of the scores.
re: Baseball: Pepperdine 1 @ LSU 8, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 3/4/10 at 7:28 pm to HeauxBeaux
re: Baseball: Game 3: Centenary 0 @ LSU 4, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 2/21/10 at 3:16 pm to johnboyjax
quote:
so what is a Lobo?
Coyote... I think.
re: Baseball: Game 3: Centenary 0 @ LSU 4, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 2/21/10 at 3:14 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
Aztecs (mascot)?
Lobos
re: Baseball: Season Opener: Centenary 4 @ LSU 5, Final
Posted by PetTiger on 2/19/10 at 9:27 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Johhny Kaplan
+1...I hated that guy. He killed us.
quote:
jefferson flings ball 40 yds out of bounds.
Out of the pocket...
quote:
bama qb throws around his offensive lineman on direct track to ingram out of the backfield
Threw it two handed while he was going down. Sure not trying to avoid a safety... GTFO.
re: Miles was satisfied with the response he received?
Posted by PetTiger on 11/10/09 at 7:58 am to h0nkifuvcoached4bama
quote:
He obviously saw Julio touching the ball while he was out of bounds - making the so called interception an incompletion.
This is rich. Look at it again, Julio was in the air when he "touched the ball" - he did not. And yes, he left the ground while he was in the field of play... This is the worst excuse for a bad call. A conspiracy - doubtful. Horrendous call - beyond doubt.
quote:
JJ was out of bounds at the time of "touching" so the "out of bounds" rule applies.
Actually he was not. He was in the air. He hadn't landed outside the field of play yet. Just after his hands moved from behind the ball, he touched down out of bounds for the first time. You can clearly see this in the numerous videos on YouTube.
quote:
doesn't that mean the fans don't like LSU as much as vegas does?
I was under the impression that after the "open", each book adjusts the line. After that time, usually Monday afternoon, the line moves with the action. So in this case, more people took State. Like you said, it just means the people betting don't like LSU giving up 2 TD's. Also, they adjusted the line back to -13. That means that too many people were taking LSU @ -12.5. It all depends on how comfortable Vegas is with where the money is being get.
First Half Highlights
Posted by PetTiger on 9/20/09 at 4:35 pm
What song was played with the first half highlights last night? Thanks...
re: Standing at the game ....
Posted by PetTiger on 9/15/09 at 1:18 pm to lsuoldschool
quote:
There is nothing wrong with that and I would also but every play does not develop as such. Do not stand on every play or jump up at every snap of the ball. Big situations and big plays are great, just don't stand 24/7
Reread the OP. This is the topic of the complaint.
Popular
0











