- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Flavius C Julianus
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 129 |
| Registered on: | 9/4/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
re: “Yo, you Sharin’?” Meaning?
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/17/24 at 7:44 am to dstone12
quote:
He Is the only white football player on the team.
Why would you do this to your kid?
re: Why are bands mysteriously disappearing? Rick Beato video
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/17/24 at 6:55 am to supatigah
quote:
the latest iteration of the billie eilish breathy whisper singing girl with super slick production is terrible
olivia rodrigo and sabrina carpenter are prime examples
Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter are not “breathy whisper singing girls”.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:46 pm to chrome_daddy
quote:
I wasn't responding to you.
Don’t be a bitch. I’m sorry. I thought you had responded to me.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:33 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
But you admitting to not working while in the office, is how I know youre not WFH for 40 hours a week
What? Can you read? How have I admitted that? GTFO.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:32 pm to Psych23
quote:
Youre cute.
Well you said it. You said you “see the world” because of your commute. Tell us about it.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:31 pm to chrome_daddy
quote:
Just stop posting. You obviously have never worked on or been around high performing teams / people / projects / orgs. They kick arse for 10-12 hours straight if they have to, no matter where it is. Please, just stop.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:16 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
I wish we could as a society move to 4 working days of 10 hours instead
On this board, that makes you a communist.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:07 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
No one spends 8 straight hours doing work at home for someones else's company,
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:06 pm to Psych23
quote:
I actually get out of the house and see the world.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 9:05 pm to stout
quote:
You're a badass, dude!
Meh. It’s just a job. I don’t tie my self worth to it. We can’t all be plant baws.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 8:58 pm to Psych23
quote:
You literally play on a computer all day. It's true.
lol. What do you do for a living? Our economy is based on “playing on a computer all day”. I close multi-million deals “playing on a computer”.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 8:48 pm to Psych23
quote:
If you have a WFH job you're first in line to he replaced by AI.
Well, that’s just not true.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 8:39 pm to chinese58
quote:
I hate people who wait until they get to the office to poop every day.
I mean, do you have some super human control over your bowels that others don’t have?
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 8:25 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
No one 'works' from home
Of course they do. This is retarded.
re: Amazon mandates five days a week in office starting next year
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 8:18 pm to Bryno1960
quote:
I guess I don’t understand why the majority of you are so anti WFH when it doesn’t affect you at all.
You know why. It’s because the majority of the people who post here work menial miserable jobs where they have to be in the “office “, and they can’t stand that others are in a different position.
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 2:09 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Partially, but many of your other posts contributed to it as well.
Oh, pray tell.
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 1:47 pm to TDTOM
quote:
You want that dipshit around kids?
Thinking that a four-day work week is a good idea with the productivity increases that we’ve had over the past 50 years in particular makes me a dipshit?
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 1:45 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
nah. it stands true. go get you a teaching job. 100+ days off every year, would be perfect for your lifestyle.
Again, doubtful.
You don’t know anything about my lifestyle. I do however notice on this board that those most vocal about how “hard working” they are tend to be middle management types at best if they’re white collar and a lot of blue collar plant baws, neither of which tend to be very high earners.
Again, suckers.
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 1:31 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
i only ever hear this from weak men
Doubtful. Working more generally is for suckers.
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 1:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
However you choose to work for a company that requires more, and complain about it.
How do you know what company I work for? Where did I complain?
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 1:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You know you can voluntarily make that happen for yourself, correct?
Can I? I don’t work in the tourism industry.
re: NY Times Tech division threatens strike. Here's their demands
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/16/24 at 12:52 pm to jcaz
quote:
You do realize most people here are white collar, right?
Eh. This place has gotten decidedly more blue collar than it used to be.
Regardless, four-day work week should be standard now.
re: Been on an 80’s Mini-Series kick
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 9:11 pm to RoyalBaby
quote:
Amazing Stories
That’s not a mini-series.
The Blue and the Gray and North and South were good ones.
re: Darwinism disproven
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 3:51 pm to labamafan
quote:
Evolution as taught when I was in school was microorganisms developing into larger organisms such as some organism crawling into a beach and later developing into different species. There is no evidence to support that.
There is evidence to support that.
re: Darwinism disproven
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 3:25 pm to 3rdgentgr
quote:
Evolution News
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 3:12 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Are you really that dense?
Bro, I would not be casting aspersions like this when you cannot interpret this rule correctly. Being defenseless is an element of targeting, you’re correct on that, but targeting is not the sole rule where being defenseless applies. I’m not sure why you’re having a disconnect on this.
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 2:45 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
The only time that applies is if targeting ALSO applies.
Wrong.
Read Article 4, Approved Ruling 9-1-4, Item X. for an example.
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 2:44 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Here is the entire blindsided block rule. Nowhere is "defenseless" mentioned.
*sigh* Go back and read the definition of “defenseless player”. You even quoted it.
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 2:41 pm to DawginSC
quote:
This is why a blindside hit requires "forcible contact" according to the NCAA rules. And any contact initiated with the hands (a shove) is by NCAA rule NOT forcible contact.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and ask you for a third time to cite this rule.
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 2:33 pm to BFANLC
quote:
That's what I thought, thanks for playing.
Read Article 12.b. for starters. You’re just talking out of your arse.
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted by Flavius C Julianus on 9/15/24 at 2:30 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
But the call wasn't blindside block.
I don’t say that it was. You claimed that the defenseless opponent standard only applies to targeting. It doesn’t.
Popular
2












