Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:101
Registered on:7/14/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Yeah that's why I specifically said orphanages and not foster care. Preferably run by the Church.
Why didn't you pick up the carcass for the meat? It was fresh
quote:

Women bear the physical risk/burden of carrying and birthing babies so I’ll call it even.


It's virtually no significant risk. I suppose we could compare the number of women who die or have complications during childbirth to the number of fathers who get injured or killed working to pay for said baby.
quote:

so no, putting a kid in an friggin orphanage (which is considerably worse than growing up on welfare with a bio parent)


Is it though? What's the data say about orphanage kids? Because the data on kids from single mother households is out, and it's an abject failure.
quote:


I understand the desire to find some sense of an “equal playing field” when it comes to reproductive rights, but it seems unnecessary to me. As a man, I can:

-choose not to sleep with women I don’t want to have kids with
-failing that, I can choose non-vaginal sex
-failing that, I can choose not to have unprotected sex vaginal sex
-failing that, I can choose to pull out

There are plenty of off-roads on the pathway to parenthood. I just don’t see a need for “the system” to do anything for a dude who chooses to take none of them


Why should the father not have the option to absolve himself of all responsibilities after the mistake was made just like women? I men they could have not had sex, made the guy wear a condom, took it up the butt or hawk tuah'd instead. And if we're going to just accept an unfair and unjust system then the man who's burdening the majority of the financial burden should get primary custody.

And if neither parent is capable of supporting the child financially then the child should be taken and made a ward of the state. End all this snap and welfare crap and use the money to build orphanages.
What's BS is that a woman can unilaterally have an abortion without even informing the father. Even if the father wanted to keep the child and release the mother of all responsibilities after birth the mother can just go "nah, I don't wanna." But if a man doesn't want to take care of a child financially or otherwise he has no say in it. In fact he's legally required to do so.

But abortion is trashy as frick in the end either way.
This really isnt that big of a deal, if it was it would've been all over the news a week ago when it happened. I suspect Falcon 9 will be launching again by early August. The FAA doesn't even conduct the investigation. SpaceX does and then hands their findings and corrective measures over to the FAA for review.
quote:

Right after elon says spacex is moving to texas

Interdasting


This actually happened a few days ago.

I don't expect this will be a very long grounding.

Boeing probably sabotaged it though so Elon couldn't get the glory of rescuing the astronauts they stranded in space.
quote:

If Elon really wants to make a statement, stop selling Teslas in CA. Just close shop in the state entirely


So just stop selling in one oh hid best markets so they can give money to his competitors?
quote:

I don't really keep up that much with space today but is there capability to retrieve and return satellites from LEO via other means?


I don't think right now but SpaceX Starship should be able to once it gets fully up and running.
quote:

You understand you are going to be handing 5+ kids to some of these upstanding men who want ZERO to do with these actual breathing human beings?


Bet they stop knocking up hoodrats after they realize they'll be rasing kids by themselves. Either way, I still think it would be better for the kids in the long run. What were doing now clearly isn't working. I mean, most of these dudes that want nothing to do with their kids or pay nothing in child support were raised by single moms.
quote:

We aren’t talking about a man that wants to be involved getting custody. We are talking about the vast majority that don’t even give a penny to their child now being forced to physically take a child


Exactly. But not till they turn about 5 or 6 years old.
quote:

How do you think it would go if those men were then forced to take the child in their physical home


Better than things are going now for kids from single moms. I mean I bet if I was so inclined to look it most single moms aren't financially supporting their own kids. They receive child support from the father or tax payer funded welfare, or both. And then they raise a bunch of drug addicts and criminals.
The SS and local PD screwed up because the situation was confusing and there was way too much miscommunication.

Any good officer military vet would know this because they've seen the exact same mistakes and confusion by highly trained combat troops in combat.


Also I'm willing to bet that 75% or more of the secret service and LEO people working the event were prior military.
quote:

the parent who is most likely to peace out of hands-on care is typically the dad.


It's practically encouraged by the legal system and large parts of the black community.

If it were up to me the father would get primary custody in most cases after the kid starts grade school. Mom's can see them every other weekend and all that nonsense. I mean the data is irrefutable, as a rule single mom's are terrible at raising well adjusted and productive members of society.
quote:

Umm, you realize thousands of thousands of women still raise children on their own. You know what you call that?

Child support…


Child support, in the accepted colloquial meaning her in America, means financial support provided to one parent from another. You know that's what I meant and so did everyone else. What you're doing is play semantics.

And THOUDANDS of women?:lol: that's the definition of statistically insignificant.