- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
PhxMarker1
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1 |
| Registered on: | 12/29/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: SCOTUS Brunson v. Adams hearing. 2020 election in front of the SCOTUS Jan 6th 2023
Posted by PhxMarker1 on 12/29/22 at 4:54 pm to TIGERHOLD
Why would SCOTUS call and ask the Brunson boys to hurry up and get their case submitted (under National emergency clause 11 and then without, see Brunson Trumpeters' video explaining Trumpeters Explain ) and then SCOTUS tosses the case? It makes no sense for SCOTUS to request expedited case only to toss it clown. :usa:
1
Popular
50
