LaTechIsBetter

[quote]2007 ? Ambrose was not even in college then.I thought you were reasoning that Tech was presently a fast team and that Carter was as fast as ambrose. i simply do no recall seeing Carter as competition for Ambrose in recent meets. Please someone with technical skills Google Luther Ambrose and p...

[quote]Check out the [i]current standing of team talent[/i] and you will realize that Tech is only doing ok.It would be a major shock for tech to lead the WAC. Not saying that they will not but am saying that none of the reviews that I have read project that. Last I saw ULM was ahead of tech in the ...

[quote] he meant a significant lead, as in 4 touchdowns against Troy.[/quote] Gotcha...

[quote]Tech gets LSU leftovers. ULM/ULLL get Tech leftovers. There's a pecking order.[/quote] Exactly. And LSU misses on a lot of guys....

[quote]Why do you post on here? I bet La Tech would lose to mcneese this year[/quote] We beat them by 21 points. How did LSU do against them?...

[quote]That is a shitload of assumptions. [/quote] Yeah, but some of it is based on memos and emails that Benson has sent to us....

[quote]There are actually some at Tech who understand the rule and have no problem with it's application, even belatedly, to their players. It's astonishing...[/quote] Are you wearing your purple panties today? The rule is what the rule says. Unfortunately, Redding is the last person that s...

[quote]Miles "confesses" what ?[/quote] That he is a titty baby....

[quote]If you don't think it was a dirty hit, then you need to remove your head from where you sit. I won't argue intent (as I don't think he intended to cause harm) but it's clear he launched himself high and made helmet to helmet contact on a defenseless receiver (thanks Lee...I argue that TT does...

[link=(http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=451&f=2368&t=5147265)]LINK[/link] Here is what the WAC commish said in response to all the email inquiries and comments....