- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Ole Miss |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 770 |
| Registered on: | 12/1/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
The other issue is- how did Alex Jones have calling the White House back in July 2001 about airplanes being used to attack WTC?
I’m not even going to try to figure out how AJ (or Bill Cooper before him) got this info but it was being provided to someone well in advance.
I’m not even going to try to figure out how AJ (or Bill Cooper before him) got this info but it was being provided to someone well in advance.
quote:
The rest you just projected to make your post seem more inflammatory.
It just seems like common sense that the CIA would know they were in flight school and boarding flights all at the same time.
quote:
The CIA, knew most if not all of the hijackers were in the US.
They knew they were Al Quaid operatives, they believed they were flipping them to work for US.
When they learned that they might be planning something against the US they CHOSE to ignore the warning because they(the CIA) believed if they could flip their targets it would be much more valuable to them and didn't want to have all their work be for nothing.
So, you are asserting the following about the CIA:
1) they knew who they were;
2) they knew who they worked for
3) they observed them all take significant flight training
4) they observed them all board transcontinental flights on the same morning
5) they didn't stop them or consider this the execution of an attack because they believed they could flip them to work for us
quote:
...and the reason you want him suspended is because of the former...not the latter.
And, you tried to justify it by pointing to the latter.
Personally, I actually want him there and protected. It's good for ratings and ratings are good for brand value.
Although I am concerned with the potential that LSU showed, I am not going to run from it.
Kiffin gave us a chance to move to Tier 1. Now, we get to play for it on a grand stage.
I absolutely want him there because I don't want any excuses to be a detriment to this opportunity.
If you think I hate Kiffin, I do not. All of this is the best opportunity we've ever been handed. We have to go and compete. Our play on Sunday night is not going to cut it when we play you guys, though.
re: Anybody going to be in the court room in Birmingham today?
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 12:28 pm to JudgeHolden
It shouldn't be long before we have a joint venture between the SEC Network and Court TV just for coverage of all the legal proceedings.
quote:
quote:
people support a monster
A monster? What exactly did he do to make him a monster?
People like Sandusky are a monster, not Lane Kiffin.
"Past 2 weeks" was the context.
I'm referring to people supporting Clancy murdering her 3 children...not Kiffin.
quote:
Since when do satire accounts start posting harmful threats? And how do we know which threats to ignore vs take seriously, particularly ones that are very direct, like that one.
People have become very sick, man. Very sick. That's the best thing about the Rant. It may not be intelligent but I don't see many unhinged types around here. Stupid- most definately. Unhinged- no.
re: I think Lane should maybe consider getting suspended for the Ole Miss game.
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 12:01 pm to Deadmanshand
quote:
Being satire doesn't matter if someone acts on it. How many times have we seen satire articles posted on here with people thinking they are real? Unbalanced people do not need much of a trigger to do something idiotic.
100% agree and we have a ton of "unbalanced" people in this word from what I've seen.
re: I think Lane should maybe consider getting suspended for the Ole Miss game.
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 12:01 pm to stopitnow1
quote:
I don't know how he thought that was funny or appropriate
After the past 2 weeks of watching people support a monster, I have no idea what people think anymore.
quote:
I think it's getting real now.
It should be sent to the FBI. Threats to life are not a joke. I learned in the past two weeks that we live in a very sick society that has no value on human life.
Also- this is not excused by the "satire" label IMO.
re: I think Lane should maybe consider getting suspended for the Ole Miss game.
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 11:39 am to geauxbrown
quote:
Ole Miss fans…. Jesus Christ
Click on the account itself. It’s satire (but not good satire)
quote:
huh? You just tried to disguise your fear of LSU as a concern for being able to protect Kiffin.
Two things can be true.
I am very concerned by what I saw Saturday night.
I am also concerned that some Ole Miss fans will do stupid stuff after drinking bourbon from 6am at Gameday through the game which kicks 13 hours later.
FYI- that’s a satire account (but not a good one)
I denounce that.
It’s not funny at all.
It’s not funny at all.
re: Ole Miss Fans: Do You Honestly Want Kiffin Suspended on 9/19?
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 11:30 am to geauxbrown
quote:
Was it you that just stated you would be concerned for his safety? That sounds like more than just being along for the ride.
I think you totally misread what I said. This is compete honesty:
Yes, I am genuinely concerned that a drunk Ole Miss fan will do something that is stupid (such as throwing crap on the field or something similar).
I don’t think there’s a significant safety issue but our fans are completely capable of making us look terrible on national television, which could destroy a narrative that elevates both schools.
quote:
A pro team gets to pay less for a pro level QB than college teams pay for amatuer level QBs and somehow you seem to think it is a problem for the pro team? Interesting indeed.
It’s a little dry humor. Lighten up.
quote:
told ya
Right or wrong- I’m pretty much flatly honest in my takes.
quote:
Actually the Rebs are the 1.5 point favorites
Seems strange after witnessing both teams this weekend. Things that make you go hmmmmm…
quote:
You're absolutely right. However, he won't settle until he is seen in court. That is how he operates. That isn't my opinion that is taken from him.
I understand.
The man has something to say.
I totally respect that in a day and age where most men will just take the bag.
quote:
Tony Clayton won't allow that to happen lmfao. Tony Clayton is a bulldog in a China Shop. He will make sure he sees the SEC in Court. He doesn't settle until he has at least gotten in front of a judge.
He has a price.
re: I’ll post this here, too: Wright/Harris lawsuit discovery
Posted by Mempho on 9/9/26 at 11:09 am to waiting4saturday
quote:
100% but this could have been avoided which is why Sankey F'd this all up. the SEC is going to pay $2-3M (which is small but not nothing) when they could have avoided this all along.
It's called a "control premium." They are essentially paying the money to have more control over their member institutions and their product.
The SEC is totally willing to pay this money to maintain the optics that this isn't truly professional football (but it obviously is).
Also, LSU made a play to go to the top in NIL, which is totally fine, but it's really all about optics. They want to keep viewers onboard with what college football provides (passion, pagaentry, history, rivalries, etc.) instead of having a "win at all costs" attitude. Whether this actually works or not- that remains to be seen. I realize that we have a quarterback making more than the Saints quarterback this year- which is crazy- but it is what it is.
In the long-term, the only things that are going to matter are coaching and NIL. The irony of this is that we are both of our programs are set to reap the benefits of this system. Now, I think it best to ask yourself- "Who is unhappy with the current state of affairs?"
Hint: it's not LSU or Ole Miss.
Top 20 in NIL (source: NIL Standard):
Rank | Program | Conference | Estimated Total Roster Spending---|---|---|---
1 | Texas Longhorns | SEC | $48.9 Million
2 | LSU Tigers | SEC | $42.8 Million
3 | Oregon Ducks | Big Ten | $42.3 Million
4 | Ohio State Buckeyes | Big Ten | $39.3 Million
5 | Miami Hurricanes | ACC | $37.8 Million
6 | Texas Tech Red Raiders | Big 12 | $36.0 Million
7 | USC Trojans | Big Ten | $35.2 Million
8 | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | Independent | $35.1 Million
9 | Ole Miss Rebels | SEC | $35.1 Million
10 | Texas A&M Aggies | SEC | $33.1 Million
11 | Indiana Hoosiers | Big Ten | $33.0 Million
12 | Tennessee Volunteers | SEC | $31.0 Million
13 | Michigan Wolverines | Big Ten | $31.0 Million
14 | Alabama Crimson Tide | SEC | $30.9 Million
15 | Oklahoma Sooners | SEC | $30.6 Million
16 | Georgia Bulldogs | SEC | $30.1 Million
17 | Auburn Tigers | SEC | $28.7 Million
18 | Florida Gators | SEC | $28.1 Million
19 | Missouri Tigers | SEC | $27.3 Million
20 | Houston Cougars | Big 12 | $27.0 Million
Popular
1












