Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Wrong side of town
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:8
Registered on:9/5/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Risk 2.0 - FEMA Finnda Eat!

Posted by lafloodcert on 9/15/21 at 2:07 pm
Ok, how about "Preferred Risk." As in, "My home is in zone X, so I have a Preferred Risk insurance policy." Regardless, I get what you are saying and I presume you understood what I meant, as well. There's no doubt 1% storm of yesterday is not the 1% storm of today. That should have been re-eval...

re: Risk 2.0 - FEMA Finnda Eat!

Posted by lafloodcert on 9/15/21 at 12:13 pm
[quote]man in the stadium[/quote] I mostly agree except for how it appears that this will be affecting zone X, historically low risk properties...if what is being reported is correct....

re: Risk 2.0 - FEMA Finnda Eat!

Posted by lafloodcert on 9/15/21 at 10:33 am
[quote]It's limited to an 18% increase per year[/quote] on existing policies....

re: Risk 2.0 - FEMA Finnda Eat!

Posted by lafloodcert on 9/15/21 at 10:27 am
Not trying to scare people. If it ends up being a nothing burger, that's great....

Risk 2.0 - FEMA Finnda Eat!

Posted by lafloodcert on 9/15/21 at 10:15 am
So as far as I can tell, most folks don't know this major change to the National Flood Insurance Program is about to happen, starting on Oct 1, 2021. FEMA is completely revamping the flood insurance program with a new system called Risk 2.0. FEMA has been tight lipped regarding all of the details...
[quote]Post pics of your wife[/quote] 2am: [img]https://media.gq.com/photos/55846e6409f0bee56443eb1c/master/w_320%2Cc_limit/slideshows-mens-standalone-gq-feature-100108-megan-fox-00001f.jpg[/img] 10am: [img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FqQEHPUq6Zc/Sl3XLO9gceI/AAAAAAAAHzc/4Jex8vujqUI/s400/fatu...
Sup! We good. There's 3 of us now. Been needing to track you down. You a TN PLA? Got something to discuss with you....
[quote]They also use the soil that was removed from the bottom of the pond to build up the land around the pond to meet base flood requirements. This meets "no net fill" ordinances, but reduces net storage volume by that exact same volume below the water surface.[/quote] Not true. Fill mitigation...