Steelnrose

I asked the President. This was his response.

Kelly's "willful refusal" to fire Sloan materially breaches his duty to supervise/direct assistant coaches and comply with reasonable AD directives. It reads pretty straight forward to me. These are normal duties of all NCAA head coaches.
We will see it play out in court, OR, Kelly settles and goes away, hopefully the latter. Either way this circus needs to end.

Only reasonable thing rumored to be worthy of firing "with cause" would be from his contract:

Termination by LSU for Cause:
"Unreasonable refusal or repeated failure to perform any duties imposed herein"
Duties and Responsibilites:
"Performing all duties and reasonably assigned to Employee by AD"

In other words, AD told him to fire Sloan. He refused. Therefore he can be fired with Cause.

If you boss tells you to fire an employee and you refuse, you can be fired.

I agree 100%.
The reason BK lost his shite on Cauble last night was because BK himself is the reason the offense is sluggish. They are overly concerned about remaining balanced which is why they constantly run the ball for no gain. It’s like they’re playing roulette to determine the next play, and occasionally Sloan is confident enough to do something “crazy” like run a skinny post with Anderson or a screen/slant with Thomas. Take what the defense gives you and make them defend every blade of grass.

My best guess
R Troop 62 Panther

I heard disconcerning but my grammar-nazi father in law informed me that it’s actually disconcerting, and told me disconcerning is not a word.

Disconcerting signals are penalties where the officials believe players on the defense are trying to simulate a snap count or hand signal for the offense.