- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 45 |
| Registered on: | 6/29/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Is A+ (Or Any Type A Blood) The Universal Defective Blood?
Posted by Sailor on 7/7/20 at 1:14 am to LSUAngelHere1
Why am I not surprised by that graph? Even personality wise O+ has all the good attributes and A+ has overwhelmingly negative attributes. Even B+ is better. Literally nothing ever positive about A+. It's almost comical, A+ truly is the Universal sh*tty blood type. :lol:
quote:
more goal post moving using BS to scare people
fact - most people on earth are A+, its THE most common blood type
its like saying if you have brown eyes you are most at risk its BS
I thought O+ was the most common blood type?
Is A+ (Or Any Type A Blood) The Universal Defective Blood?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 11:59 pm
Serious question. Everything I ever read seems to say that if you're Type A blood you're more like to get this, or that, or something else. We're more likely to be overweight, have heart issues, suffer from allergies, etc. Being A+ I'm also not the universal giver or universal receiver either.
Now with the Coronavirus it's come up once again that those with Type A blood are more likely to have more severe symptoms if they catch the Coronavirus.
In all seriousness, is there any benefit at all to having Type A blood? Because there sure doesn't seem like it. Especially compared to Type O blood. It seems like Type A blood is the universal sh*tty blood. Too bad we haven't figured out a way to change people's blood types and give everyone O+ blood.
Now with the Coronavirus it's come up once again that those with Type A blood are more likely to have more severe symptoms if they catch the Coronavirus.
In all seriousness, is there any benefit at all to having Type A blood? Because there sure doesn't seem like it. Especially compared to Type O blood. It seems like Type A blood is the universal sh*tty blood. Too bad we haven't figured out a way to change people's blood types and give everyone O+ blood.
re: Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 2:43 pm to RealityTiger
quote:
If they have the game, the stadium will be full. We have been itching, begging, pleading, for something to distract us from Covid 19 and racial tensions.
Maybe you are but JBE is not ready to let the spotlight go away from him. JBE is not ready for you all to be distracted. You really think JBE cares if LSU football goes on this season or not? Newsflash, he doesn't.
re: Leach and Kiffin both hate being at their Mississippi schools
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 2:21 pm to arkfan1978
I definitely can see Kiffin hating Oxford. I mean to go from Boca Raton to Oxford? I'm not even a big fan of South Florida and even I would say that's a huge step down.
If Kiffin had been smart (which when has Kiffin ever been smart?) I feel like he should've stayed at FAU. He was really starting to build something down there. He could've had a few more successful years and waited for the Miami job to open up (Diaz isn't going to work out there). Miami would've been a much better cultural fit for Kiffin.
If Kiffin had been smart (which when has Kiffin ever been smart?) I feel like he should've stayed at FAU. He was really starting to build something down there. He could've had a few more successful years and waited for the Miami job to open up (Diaz isn't going to work out there). Miami would've been a much better cultural fit for Kiffin.
quote:
they made me in karate back in the day, in retrospect i should have solely been fooling around with Kung Fu instead of Shotokan and muay thai.
As someone who has worked with many people from Japan, South Korea and China over the last 10 years I can tell you the full bow is not used regularly. That's mostly for family members, formal occasions and people who are much higher up on the social ladder than you. In common society it's usually just a quick bow.
Is there any real reason why you would be against it though. I mean a nod in some way is kind of like a bow.
re: Bow vs Hand Shake/Double Kiss on Cheeks?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 2:11 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
frick bowing and the queer arse kiss on the cheeks
I'm never been a fan of the kiss on the cheeks either but that's more Europe anyway. What is your problem with bowing though? You can't deny it's probably some of the reason why the rest of Asia (besides China obviously) hasn't bit hit nearly as hard by this virus.
I've always found the bow to be more respectful than the hand shake anyway. Plus with the hand shake there's more complications like "how long do I hold it for?" and "how firm do I do it?" I've never understood the dislike here in the US for the bow.
quote:
I prefer a hello and a nod.
I agree with this. When I say bow I don't mean going all the way down to where you're looking at the ground. Even most Asian cultures don't do that anymore unless it's a person from a much higher social group or family members (parents, grandparents).
But I think a hello and a quick nod/quick bow would be best.
quote:
I’d suggest a lot of gap years for some of these kids.
Work as a bartender or something and chill
The real world blows and no need to hurry through internet college to get into it
Agree. If there's going to be any time to take a year off and do "self discovery" this would be it. My niece starts college this fall and honestly if she wasn't admitted into the honors college at UK I would recommend she take the year off. She inquired but they indicated if she delayed enrolling she would not be guaranteed honors placement next year. She would essentially have to reapply.
But yeah for a lot of regular students starting college this year or maybe still in their freshmen or sophomore years I would truly consider taking this year off. It's going to be a sh*tshow and the level of education will be down dramatically IMO.
Bow vs Hand Shake/Double Kiss on Cheeks?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:59 pm
Obviously West vs East on this one. Historically in the East, especially among Eastern Asian civilizations, the formal greeting is a bow compared to the formal greeting of a hand shake or a double kiss on the cheeks in the West.
Due to the pandemic could we see a long term change to more of a bow vs. the more traditional Western greetings? The bow of course has the advantage in that there is no physical contact. I mean we've already gotten to the point now where I won't shake hands with anyone that isn't a good friend or family member.
Never mind the virus hasn't hit Asian countries like Japan, South Korea or Singapore nearly as bad as it's hit the US and Europe.
As much as some may be against it or want to fight it, would it be better long term to adopt the bow as a formal greeting in the west as compared to the hand shake or especially the double kiss on the cheeks? Or in the very least adopt some sort of greeting that does not include physical contact with the other person?
Due to the pandemic could we see a long term change to more of a bow vs. the more traditional Western greetings? The bow of course has the advantage in that there is no physical contact. I mean we've already gotten to the point now where I won't shake hands with anyone that isn't a good friend or family member.
Never mind the virus hasn't hit Asian countries like Japan, South Korea or Singapore nearly as bad as it's hit the US and Europe.
As much as some may be against it or want to fight it, would it be better long term to adopt the bow as a formal greeting in the west as compared to the hand shake or especially the double kiss on the cheeks? Or in the very least adopt some sort of greeting that does not include physical contact with the other person?
re: If I Told You You Have to Wear a Mask to Have LSU Football
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:54 pm to boxcarbarney
I agree, look at Japan, it's become part of the culture over there. I could easily see it becoming part of the culture here as well.
quote:
I don't give a shite if there aren't ANY fans in Tiger Stadium for that game as long as the Texas locker room is hot as piss.
Might be the one time where we want a day game at Tiger Stadium. Have it at high noon with no A/C in the Texas locker room.
No doubt though that it becomes much easier for Texas to come out of Tiger Stadium with a win if there's no fans in the stands. I want them to be subjected to the full Tiger Stadium experience, including going home with a loss. :lol:
re: 2020 SEC Football Season: Best Scheduling Scenario
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:51 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Works for me. UF will be rebuilding in 2021
It'll be interesting to see what the NCAA does regarding eligibility. I'm guessing they would have to extend eligibility for all fall athletes. Again essentially a freeze. If you're a senior this year you'll still be considered a senior in 2021. Now whether or not those athletes come back for another year would be another story.
re: Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:39 pm to austintexastiger
I don't disagree that the game might not ever be played. But Texas isn't getting out of it scot free either. They're either playing the game in Tiger Stadium (whether this year or a future year) or they are paying LSU a good chunk of change to get out of the contract.
re: Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:34 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
If we cancel the season or the SEC cancels the season, our contract with Texas is over. They would not owe us a game.
Have you read the contract? I'm guessing there's easily some sort of natural disaster/act of God clause in there that would prevent that. And I'm pretty sure a global pandemic would qualify as a natural disaster/act of God.
I agree that if LSU or the SEC cancels the season the contract could become void. But what about if the Texas governor cancels Texas season? Or JBE cancels the LSU season? Or if the NCAA says no college football period? What happens then? I'll be honest, I don't know, but I seriously doubt it gets Texas out of the contract. Unless of course Texas is willing to buy their way out of the contract and with college athletics in trouble as it is I'm guessing Texas wouldn't want to do that. If the lawyers for LSU are worth anything (and who knows on that, lol) I'm guessing a buyout for either side would be cost prohibitive.
My thing would be if I was LSU make a good faith effort with Texas to try to reschedule for a later year. It would be best for both parties involved and maybe even put in there that if Texas agrees to move the game to another year that LSU will play Texas in a neutral site game in Dallas at some point with all the money generated going to Texas.
re: Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:20 pm to The Hurricane
quote:
It won’t be. Too much maneuvering would need to take place for just one game.
It's one game. In the face of the virus the maneuvering isn't that hard. Where there's a will there's a way.
What's Texas going to do if the whole season is canceled? The contract with still stand, they will still owe us a game at Tiger Stadium. They'd have to maneuver to fit LSU in on a future schedule anyway.
Why not just make it easier now and start planning for it? It doesn't even have to be next year, it could be a few years in the future wherever both Texas and LSU have room. But it can be done and it wouldn't be that hard.
re: Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 1:12 pm to lsutigers718
quote:
Many won’t like what I’m about to mention but best bet to have football in my opinion is do it like premier league. Have no fans and still televise each game just like normal. We could still have football and have a season. I understanding the protests and people are in large crowds so why not with football. I would think it would be safer just to have players only.
I would agree with this as long as Texas agreed that they still owe us a home game from the home-home. Otherwise I'd like to see LSU work with Texas to delay the game to another year.
quote:
Nah they let thousands of people protest in the streets. Why would filling Tiger Stadium be any different?
Because you know and I know that JBE will never hold protestors the same standard that he would hold other events. JBE will say that the protests are far more important and therefor they have a right to protest. That on the other hand LSU fans do not have the right to attend a game at Tiger Stadium if it's not safe.
Look at Florida, they shut down Miami Beach over the 4th of July weekend. They didn't shut down any of the protests. The protestors are always going to be held to a different standard. Most of the media is still trying to convince us that the protests AREN'T the reason we're having a new surge of the virus when we all know it's the truth. It's sickening but it's the truth.
Guarantee you JBE will shut down college football in the state of Louisiana before he allows 100,000 fans inside Tiger Stadium this fall. And since LSU is a state university JBE does have the ultimate say. It'll be 25-35,000 allowed in at most.
I don't want Texas coming in and leaving thinking "well what's the big deal about Death Valley, it's no better than Darrell K. Royal Stadium. Death Valley is overrated". I want them going out of there literally shaking realizing that while the atmosphere at Texas games is big, Death Valley at night is a whole different animal. I want them going home with a loss and getting to have the complete LSU experience and never wanting to come back. :lol:
Should LSU vs. Texas be delayed?
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 12:53 pm
I ask this because it's our premier non conference game and it's one of those once in a generation games. Normally Tiger Stadium would be lit for a game like this but now Texas is going to get the better end of the deal. They got all the economic impact of the game in Austin whereas we won't get anywhere near the economic impact that we would've gotten in a normal year in Baton Rouge.
At this point there's no chance of college football having games right now with a full crowd. At best Tiger Stadium would be around 50% capacity for this game, most likely more around 20-30%.
For the economic impact angle as well as letting Texas fans experience Tiger Stadium, should the Texas game be pushed back to another year? It would just be sad to see this type of game in an empty Tiger Stadium.
At this point there's no chance of college football having games right now with a full crowd. At best Tiger Stadium would be around 50% capacity for this game, most likely more around 20-30%.
For the economic impact angle as well as letting Texas fans experience Tiger Stadium, should the Texas game be pushed back to another year? It would just be sad to see this type of game in an empty Tiger Stadium.
re: 2020 SEC Football Season: Best Scheduling Scenario
Posted by Sailor on 7/6/20 at 12:35 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
No Alabama for UGA? I'll take it since it helps our chance to win the East again
Yep any other inter division games had to be scraped. But I would just push everything back a year. So Bama-UGA would play in Tuscaloosa in 2021.
SEC East Schedule:
Florida
9/26 - Tennessee
10/3 - South Carolina
10/10 - LSU
10/17 - Kentucky
10/31 - Georgia
11/7 - Vanderbilt
11/14 - Missouri
Georgia
9/26 - Kentucky
10/3 - Vanderbilt
10/10 - Auburn
10/17 - Missouri
10/31 - Florida
11/7 - South Carolina
11/14 - Tennessee
Tennessee
9/26 - Florida
10/3 - Missouri
10/10 - South Carolina
10/17 - Vanderbilt
10/31 - Alabama
11/7 - Kentucky
11/14 - Georgia
Missouri
9/19 - South Carolina
9/26 - Vanderbilt
10/3 - Tennessee
10/17 - Georgia
10/24 - Kentucky
10/31 - Arkansas
11/14 - Florida
South Carolina
9/19 - Missouri
10/3 - Florida
10/10 - Tennessee
10/24 - Texas A&M
10/31 - Kentucky
11/7 - Georgia
11/14 - Vanderbilt
Kentucky
9/19 - Vanderbilt
9/26 - Georgia
10/17 - Florida
10/24 - Missouri
10/31 - South Carolina
11/7 - Tennessee
11/14 - Miss State
Vanderbilt
9/19 - Kentucky
9/26 - Missouri
10/3 - Georgia
10/10 - Ole Miss
10/17 - Tennessee
11/7 - Florida
11/14 - South Carolina
I really think this type of scenario would be the best chance of us having an SEC Football season this year.
Florida
9/26 - Tennessee
10/3 - South Carolina
10/10 - LSU
10/17 - Kentucky
10/31 - Georgia
11/7 - Vanderbilt
11/14 - Missouri
Georgia
9/26 - Kentucky
10/3 - Vanderbilt
10/10 - Auburn
10/17 - Missouri
10/31 - Florida
11/7 - South Carolina
11/14 - Tennessee
Tennessee
9/26 - Florida
10/3 - Missouri
10/10 - South Carolina
10/17 - Vanderbilt
10/31 - Alabama
11/7 - Kentucky
11/14 - Georgia
Missouri
9/19 - South Carolina
9/26 - Vanderbilt
10/3 - Tennessee
10/17 - Georgia
10/24 - Kentucky
10/31 - Arkansas
11/14 - Florida
South Carolina
9/19 - Missouri
10/3 - Florida
10/10 - Tennessee
10/24 - Texas A&M
10/31 - Kentucky
11/7 - Georgia
11/14 - Vanderbilt
Kentucky
9/19 - Vanderbilt
9/26 - Georgia
10/17 - Florida
10/24 - Missouri
10/31 - South Carolina
11/7 - Tennessee
11/14 - Miss State
Vanderbilt
9/19 - Kentucky
9/26 - Missouri
10/3 - Georgia
10/10 - Ole Miss
10/17 - Tennessee
11/7 - Florida
11/14 - South Carolina
I really think this type of scenario would be the best chance of us having an SEC Football season this year.
Popular
0











