- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Sir Thomas Bombadil
| Favorite team: | Georgia |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 40 |
| Registered on: | 1/24/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
re: Transfer portal out/in
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 12/14/23 at 6:48 pm to dawg-fan#1
DawgNation reporting JDJ to the portal.
re: ATL airport - OT
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/18/23 at 7:31 pm to deeprig9
I did not expect to lose an hour of my night clicking through Georgia outdoors YouTube videos, but here we are.
Good link.
Good link.
re: Clarke county 71.1% voting warnock at the moment
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/9/22 at 10:14 am to BeefDawg
So your position is that so many people didn’t vote straight R/D down the ticket, so fraud must have occurred?
I’m also in this camp of split ticket. I don’t love Warnock, and definitely don’t agree with him on everything, but I dislike him as a candidate much less than I do Walker.
I think you’re seriously underestimating the population that thinks this way (and poll numbers would agree).
I’m also in this camp of split ticket. I don’t love Warnock, and definitely don’t agree with him on everything, but I dislike him as a candidate much less than I do Walker.
I think you’re seriously underestimating the population that thinks this way (and poll numbers would agree).
re: Ainge seems to want Georgia to get loud.
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/4/22 at 2:24 pm to lewis and herschel
He very well could be right. I have memories of attending games when I was younger (late 90s and even through the late 00s) where the Section 130ish seats had most people sitting down throughout the game, and generally were not that loud.
There is a big difference in the crowd in 2004 v. today, though. The crowd was rabid for the Arkansas game last year at noon...
There is a big difference in the crowd in 2004 v. today, though. The crowd was rabid for the Arkansas game last year at noon...
re: Biden Whispers into Microphone About Blowing Up the Russian Stock Market... and ours!
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 3/11/22 at 5:28 pm to Schmelly
Get that voice of reason out of here.
That stock market has been closed because the Ruble has taken a beating and western money is pulling out of Russia at an incredible pace. There may be a way to shell out misinformation on a lot of what Russians are dealing with, but there really isn’t a way to hide a crashing stock market.
Of course the same people talking about Biden blowing up our stock market are talking about a stolen election, so there’s no room for reason here (regardless of how you personally feel about Biden).
That stock market has been closed because the Ruble has taken a beating and western money is pulling out of Russia at an incredible pace. There may be a way to shell out misinformation on a lot of what Russians are dealing with, but there really isn’t a way to hide a crashing stock market.
Of course the same people talking about Biden blowing up our stock market are talking about a stolen election, so there’s no room for reason here (regardless of how you personally feel about Biden).
re: Was wondering if the THUG fans could give any opinion about Auburn
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 2/8/22 at 10:49 am to JJJimmyJimJames
1980
re: Stetson Bennett returning for 2022
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/19/22 at 8:17 pm to RD Dawg
I’m no insider, but there have been multiple mentions of Burton being a possible transfer for a few weeks.
re: If Bama had Metchie and Williams
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/17/22 at 10:16 am to icheerforgeorgia
1980
re: UGA fans should be on their knees thanking..
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/12/22 at 5:07 am to Spunky
Boooooo. Get out of here.
re: Spurrier: Georgia will make adjustments on defense, beat Bama to win National Championship
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/8/22 at 2:56 pm to Gaggle
Adjustception
re: Not so subtle brag thread...
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 12/4/21 at 11:03 am to dallasga6
I’m going to continue pounding Miller lites, I tell you what.
re: Hey - grown men who bark at people
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/30/21 at 3:22 pm to Frac the world
Have you ever barked at someone before? You should try it sometime - it’s exhilarating.
Also, barking is how I initiate romance with my wife. Almost 100% of the time it’s effective sometimes.
Most importantly, you left out an important detail. Not only do we bark, but we also spit.
Also, barking is how I initiate romance with my wife. Almost 100% of the time it’s effective sometimes.
Most importantly, you left out an important detail. Not only do we bark, but we also spit.
re: Kirby halftime speech vs. UF....
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/17/21 at 7:27 am to thatguy45
Clutch those pearls harder, I’m almost there.
re: Heard from a source that says Adam Anderson’s accuser is mad she had to do walk of shame
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/10/21 at 4:55 pm to Lucius Clay
quote:
All things considered, doesn't accusing someone of rape and all that comes with it for the woman seem like it would be an irrational response to being embarrassed by a "walk of shame"? If this was a ploy to get money from an NFL player, false accusation makes sense. But embarrassed because some people saw her leave a residence?
No idea what’s true in all of this, but I’ve thought of the NFL angle as well. It doesn’t particularly make sense as a money grab at this point to me because of the timing. If I was going to extort money from someone, I’d wait until post-draft when they were assuredly in the first round, as opposed to potentially ruining that first round money.
Who knows what happened.
re: Kevin Mays Lawsuit
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/26/21 at 6:44 pm to muttenstein
Jesus. That’s not a shot fired - it’s a full blown broadside.
re: Injury Report
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/13/21 at 2:29 pm to DirtyDawg
A vivid description that captures my feelings exactly.
re: Injury Report
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/13/21 at 2:08 pm to RocketDawg
There was an article earlier today with an injury report that indicated Smith had a lower body/leg contusion. Pretty sure it said he was questionable.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 8:06 pm to SquatchDawg
Hope things go well with your kid and household. Sounds like those symptoms are pretty mild, and the Xbox probably helps make that bearable.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 8:02 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
You’re contending there are variants and this is why cases and hospitalizations are up 300%, and at the same time insisting the vaccine makes the vaxxed more protected than the unvaxxed.
How in the blue frick can you have it both ways?
Did the vaccine for the original strain suddenly begin protecting against the variants?
Here’s a clue… it hasn’t.
In your rambling diatribe, you have missed - or deliberately ignored - the materials I cited above, as well as the study you cited yourself. I've requoted below for convenience:
quote:
While this sounds discouraging, it’s important to keep three things in mind:
Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease.
Breakthrough infections among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon.
The majority of new COVID-19 infections in the US are among unvaccinated people.
Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease, breakthrough infections and disease among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon, and most of the new COVID-19 cases in the U.S. are among unvaccinated people.
(Again, emphasis added.)
It stands to reason that a more transmissible variant could result in significantly increased hospitalizations when most of the new cases are unvaccinated, and unvaccinated individuals have an 10x higher chance to be hospitalized compared to vaccinated individuals.
The vaccines are not as effective against the Delta variant as they were from the original variant, but the data show that they still provide significantly decreased risk of hospitalization/death, and some reduction in the chance of becoming infected in the first place.
quote:
So all these people with variants OBVIOUSLY have the same viral load particles as the unvaxxed.
Please quote me above where I disagree with this. Based on the information I have seen, vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals appear to carry the same viral loads upon infection. However, people disingenuously use that information to show vaccines aren't effective (as you are doing now), while ignoring that vaccines also decrease the risk of infection in the first place. If someone gets infected - sure, they carry the same viral load. But the studies I've linked above indicate a vaccinated individual is 4.5x less likely to be infected. If the individual is not infected, then they won't have a viral load.
quote:
Again, the powers at be are lying to us and some of you buffoons can’t process quite simple logic because you’re idiots, and you just gobble up whatever your tribe tells you.
So again, if vaxxed people can still transmit covid, and the vaxxed folks believe they are still somehow protected, why the hell do you care if anyone is unvaxxed?
Again, you've ignored what I said on this previously. And again, I've requoted below for convenience:
quote:
As stated above, vaccination reduces chance of infection (and hospitalization and death). Unvaccinated individuals are more likely to catch COVID; therefore, are more likely to spread it, which affects everyone (including vaccinated individuals).
If unvaccinated individuals are 4.5x more likely to be infected with COVID, it stands to reason that everyone is better off with everyone vaccinated, as there is a lower likelihood that an individual becomes infected, which reduces community spread.
quote:
Think for a moment on this hypothetical… let’s say everyone on the planet is vaxxed. Literally 100% global vaccination. Is covid suddenly gone? Are there no more hospitalizations and deaths?
It'd be nice if it worked that way. There wouldn't be a complete elimination, but based on the data cited above, there would be a substantial reduction in hospitalizations/deaths, and a noticeable reduction in transmission.
quote:
NO!!! Because the goddamn thing is going to mutate and the vaccine doesn’t do shite for any subsequent variant.
The vaccine is not as effective against Delta as it was Alpha, but the data show that transmissibility, hospitalization, and death still are reduced. In a perfect world, we'd see a 100% reduction in all of that; but I'll take a substantial reduction if 100% isn't attainable - it's not an all or nothing concept. As Volatire said: "Perfect is the enemy of good."
quote:
And now we have everyone in close quarters with max viral load again in their transmissible airways. Nobody has antibodies because the vaccine disrupts covid-recovered immunity, the mRNA spike proteins are causing ADE and more frequent mutations, and this fricking shite never ends.
When the solution is in viable treatments that we should be taking the instant we have symptoms. Treatments that would virtually eliminate hospitalizations, where it’s too freaking late to do anything but go on a ventilator and wait to die.
You keep focusing on treatments instead of prevention. There is some quote (that I'll paraphrase) that says something along the lines of "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." I have no qualms developing treatments to COVID cases, but to ignore prevention is a grave mistake. A seatbelt reduces your risk of death in a car accident, but not driving recklessly reduces your chance of needing the seatbelt.
quote:
But existing treatments don’t make Big Pharma money, and politicians can’t get their big campaign donations and kickbacks when that happens. So we’re stuck in this perpetual bull shite until folks like you stop being stupid and start realizing their stories don’t add up.
Your pharmacy conspiracy theories don't change the results of the data, which indicate that vaccines reduce transmissibility, hospitalization, and death.
So, either:
(1) the "powers that be" have so much power as to be able to influence scientists across the globe to drive some dystopian fantasy where everyone is getting tricked by BigPharma into being vaccinated because of campaign contributions by BigPharma, or
(2) these conspiracy theories bandied about on Facebook and elsewhere on the internet aren't based in reality, rely on ignoring arguments and data (which you have done above), cherry-pick information out of context (which you have done above), and resort to asking random "why" questions that no one is asking and dismissing any opposing position by referring to others as "buffoons," "idiots," part of some "tribe," etc. (again, which you have done above).
Occam's Razor suggests the latter.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 8:01 pm to BeefDawg
Delete - somehow managed multiple duplicate posts.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 8:01 pm to BeefDawg
Delete - somehow managed multiple duplicate posts.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 3:52 pm to BeefDawg
I mean, in terms of why things are different from last year, we have a different variant at play. Are you contending that it’s vaccine related? Something else? Do you have a source? I’d be curious to see that information.
I had a feeling NYT would be considered #fakenews, which is why I included the sourced CDC study. Check out the table in the study - it’s fairly clear. They also break things down by age group and then provide an aggregate number.
Nothing in that study or what I said is inconsistent with the study in your link. Your linked study says that should individuals with breakthrough infections are just as infectious as individuals without a vaccine. That does not affect my premise: vaccinated individuals are less likely to transmit COVID because they are less likely to catch it. You have to have a breakthrough infection in order to transmit COVID, and a vaccinated individual is 4.5 times less likely to catch it.
Also, a few quotes from your article:
(Emphasis added.)
Not sure what I’ve said that prompts an “idiot” response, but no worries. I’m not trying to start an argument with you - I’m fully aware I’m not going to change your mind. I just thought some additional would be good to have in case someone capable of critical thinking came by and had been vaccine hesitant.
Edit: on my phone and missed a few other comments - apologies:
I didn’t say anything about the mandate. I don’t support a federal mandate - I think that’s an overreach.
As stated above, vaccination reduces chance of infection (and hospitalization and death). Unvaccinated individuals are more likely to catch COVID; therefore, are more likely to spread it, which affects everyone (including vaccinated individuals).
Has nothing to do with the data we both have cited above, so not really sure how it’s relevant.
I had a feeling NYT would be considered #fakenews, which is why I included the sourced CDC study. Check out the table in the study - it’s fairly clear. They also break things down by age group and then provide an aggregate number.
Nothing in that study or what I said is inconsistent with the study in your link. Your linked study says that should individuals with breakthrough infections are just as infectious as individuals without a vaccine. That does not affect my premise: vaccinated individuals are less likely to transmit COVID because they are less likely to catch it. You have to have a breakthrough infection in order to transmit COVID, and a vaccinated individual is 4.5 times less likely to catch it.
Also, a few quotes from your article:
quote:
While this sounds discouraging, it’s important to keep three things in mind:
Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease.
Breakthrough infections among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon.
The majority of new COVID-19 infections in the US are among unvaccinated people.
quote:
Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease, breakthrough infections and disease among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon, and most of the new COVID-19 cases in the U.S. are among unvaccinated people.
(Emphasis added.)
Not sure what I’ve said that prompts an “idiot” response, but no worries. I’m not trying to start an argument with you - I’m fully aware I’m not going to change your mind. I just thought some additional would be good to have in case someone capable of critical thinking came by and had been vaccine hesitant.
Edit: on my phone and missed a few other comments - apologies:
quote:
Also, explain the logic that mandates are needed if only people who choose to be unvaxxed are at risk?
I didn’t say anything about the mandate. I don’t support a federal mandate - I think that’s an overreach.
quote:
If you’re vaxxed, and you truly believe the covid jab protects you, why the frick do you care if anyone else chooses to go unprotected?
As stated above, vaccination reduces chance of infection (and hospitalization and death). Unvaccinated individuals are more likely to catch COVID; therefore, are more likely to spread it, which affects everyone (including vaccinated individuals).
quote:
Again, why are these people bypassing all medical standards of “treatment” and going 100% straight to the vaccine? And not only all in on the vaccine, but actually LYING continually about viable treatments that are consistently proving to work? Why are doctors sending people home without prescriptions? Why are pharmacies getting bullied into not filling prescriptions?
Has nothing to do with the data we both have cited above, so not really sure how it’s relevant.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/12/21 at 3:02 pm to BeefDawg
A New York Times article from a few days ago had some numbers supporting vaccination:
LINK
(Might need to access the article in incognito if paywalled. Though I believe it’s sourcing the numbers from this study: LINK )
So having the vaccine makes you less likely to catch COVID (not to mention the reduced hospitalization and death chances).
In response to:
I’d say that unvaccinated people need to be vaccinated because vaccination reduces (though does not eliminate spread). (Again, in addition to the obvious benefits of reduced risk of hospitalization and death.)
Based on the study, a group of vaccinated individuals should be less likely to have COVID, and therefore are less likely to spread COVID. Adding unvaccinated individuals to that mix increases the chances of adding people who are more likely to catch COVID and introduce it to the group, which increases the risk of spread.
Based on the study, your bolded parenthetical appears to be false.
quote:
Three studies that drew data from different U.S. regions evaluated the protective power of the vaccines. One looked at more than 600,000 virus cases in 13 states, representing about one quarter of the U.S. population, between April and July, and concluded that individuals who were not fully vaccinated were far more susceptible to infection and death from the virus.
They were 4.5 times more likely than vaccinated individuals to become infected, 10 times more likely to be hospitalized, and 11 times more likely to die from the coronavirus, the study found.
LINK
(Might need to access the article in incognito if paywalled. Though I believe it’s sourcing the numbers from this study: LINK )
So having the vaccine makes you less likely to catch COVID (not to mention the reduced hospitalization and death chances).
In response to:
quote:
You clowns are insufferable. You still can’t explain why unvaxxed people need to get the vaccine if you can still get and transmit (at the same or greater rate) the virus when vaxxed.
I’d say that unvaccinated people need to be vaccinated because vaccination reduces (though does not eliminate spread). (Again, in addition to the obvious benefits of reduced risk of hospitalization and death.)
Based on the study, a group of vaccinated individuals should be less likely to have COVID, and therefore are less likely to spread COVID. Adding unvaccinated individuals to that mix increases the chances of adding people who are more likely to catch COVID and introduce it to the group, which increases the risk of spread.
Based on the study, your bolded parenthetical appears to be false.
re: COVID Spike at UGA
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/8/21 at 9:32 pm to FlexDawg
> links to same source you referenced
> provides additional data from CDC
> provides reasoned analysis of sourced material
> Your response is “lol, fake news.”
In a prior life, this would be an evident, but funny, troll. In the present, I honestly can’t tell anymore. I hope you’re okay.
> provides additional data from CDC
> provides reasoned analysis of sourced material
> Your response is “lol, fake news.”
In a prior life, this would be an evident, but funny, troll. In the present, I honestly can’t tell anymore. I hope you’re okay.
re: 247: The Crimson Tide...likely the favorite to win it all during the 2021 season
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 4/20/21 at 5:18 am to Nitro Express
quote:
I'm going with UGA to win the SEC next year. Can't wait for the Clemson game.
Maybe UGA can hang another preseason championship banner.
What do you mean "maybe"? Mine is already up. Running out of wall space, frankly.
re: OT - Big Green Egg
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 2/4/21 at 5:18 am to SquatchDawg
I googled that question when I accidentally bought briquettes instead of lump (no idea how that actually happened) and decided it wasn't worth the risk.
It may be a really clever marketing ploy to encourage people to buy BGE lump charcoal, but who knows.
It may be a really clever marketing ploy to encourage people to buy BGE lump charcoal, but who knows.
re: OT - Big Green Egg
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/31/21 at 1:23 pm to deeprig9
Oven pizza doesn't get the smoke that the BGE pizza does.
re: OT - Big Green Egg
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 1/30/21 at 7:00 pm to drunkensailor89
(1) Crank up egg to 700;
(2) throw thick steak on;
(3) flip after 2-4 minutes (depending on thickness);
(4) flip again after 2-4 minutes (depending on thickness) and shut all vents and cap egg;
(5) let sit in the shut down grill for 2+ minutes and use meat thermometer to check temp of meat and either pull off or let sit longer;
(6) profit.
There will be slight variations depending on the thickness of your meat. If your steak is a think ribeye, for example, you'll want to keep closer to the 2 minutes per side. However, when I've got some really thick filets, it takes 4+ minutes per side. You get an incredible char and a perfect rare to mid-rare on the inside. I'm a bit disappointed when I go to Bones these days, as I can make better steaks for less at home.
Also, pizzas on the BGE are the bomb. Once you start making pizza on the BGE, you won't be able to order traditional delivery - they taste like garbage.
(2) throw thick steak on;
(3) flip after 2-4 minutes (depending on thickness);
(4) flip again after 2-4 minutes (depending on thickness) and shut all vents and cap egg;
(5) let sit in the shut down grill for 2+ minutes and use meat thermometer to check temp of meat and either pull off or let sit longer;
(6) profit.
There will be slight variations depending on the thickness of your meat. If your steak is a think ribeye, for example, you'll want to keep closer to the 2 minutes per side. However, when I've got some really thick filets, it takes 4+ minutes per side. You get an incredible char and a perfect rare to mid-rare on the inside. I'm a bit disappointed when I go to Bones these days, as I can make better steaks for less at home.
Also, pizzas on the BGE are the bomb. Once you start making pizza on the BGE, you won't be able to order traditional delivery - they taste like garbage.
re: Number of National Championships in your lifetime
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/19/20 at 5:22 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Georgia - 0
So are you leaving offseason titles out of it? We've got at least 3 of those.
Fake list.
re: Just read an interesting post...
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 11/17/20 at 5:59 am to lewis and herschel
They insure the weird stuff. Athletes are probably the most boring.
Other examples: Troy Polamalu insured his hair. Lloyd's also has insured hair, legs, nose, taste buds, smile, and beards.
Other examples: Troy Polamalu insured his hair. Lloyd's also has insured hair, legs, nose, taste buds, smile, and beards.
re: 5* DT Maason Smith discussion
Posted by Sir Thomas Bombadil on 9/10/20 at 3:36 pm to geauxcoco
After watching the 2019 hit series "The Life and Adventures of Zach Evans: the Man, the Myth, the 'Where did he end up Anyway?'", I'll believe this kid is coming out of LA when I see him on the field in the 2021 season. Not a moment before.
Popular
2












