LGarret1990

quote:

---

What does that have to do with Carolyne’s story?

---

What is Carolyne's story? So far, all we have is the story of two confirmed idiot liars who claim to represent someone named Carolyne.

Jacob Wohl claimed as of yesterday to have no connection to surefire intelligence. Today, he's the founder, and only known employee. The website is a fake. It's a fake intel firm. Thus, of course, Jacob's claim that he first represented "Carolyne" by investigating money stolen form her before she told him of this event is also a lie.

Speaking of "Carolyne", the reason there is confusion about her name is because Wohl and Burkman at first insisted it was spelled "Carolyn", and it wasn't until a reporter asked if it might be "Carolyne" that they stated that was the spelling.

The reason Wohl gave that she didn't show up is that she wanted to remain anonymous (he's on video saying this THIS morning). Odd that someone who wants to remain anonymous give them permission to reveal her name...

The other genius at the podium, Burkman, actually tweeted in the past that he could produce three women willing to make false claims about anyone in Washington. I hope that if Carolyne is real, she decides to get a smarter attorney than one who has publicly bragged about being able to fake this exact kind of thing. Then of course there's the fact that this is the SECOND press conference of this sort for Burkman THIS YEAR. The first one also featured a last second cancellation by the supposed accuser.


The best part of the press conference by far, though, had to be Wohl claiming that Mueller "leaked" that he jury duty in Washington DC the day of this alleged event. Surprising his "intelligence firm of one" didn't uncover during its "extensive" investigation that WaPo actually reported that Mueller was present for jury duty, complete with a picture, IN AUGUST OF 2010! Did his firm forget to google "Robert Mueller August 2010"? Is he claiming that story was planted eight years ago? Seems like checking for alibis should be a part of their investigation protocol if it isn't already.