- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

BRTigerDad
Favorite team: | LSU ![]() |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 118 |
Registered on: | 10/10/2018 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: **Confirmed**Mueller to be #metoo’d November 1st (Cliffs in OP)
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 7:49 pm
So in other words, you have nothing.
Nothing, just like this bullshite attack on Mueller.
And all of you fools just slurped it up.
Nothing, just like this bullshite attack on Mueller.
And all of you fools just slurped it up.
re: **Confirmed**Mueller to be #metoo’d November 1st (Cliffs in OP)
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 7:20 pm
Don't you think witnesses should have been interviewed?
re: **Confirmed**Mueller to be #metoo’d November 1st (Cliffs in OP)
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 7:17 pm
Investigate it thoroughly.
You know, unlike what was done in a recent vetting for a Supreme Court seat. This time, actually investigate all of it, report the conclusions, and let the chips fall where they may.
#notworried
You know, unlike what was done in a recent vetting for a Supreme Court seat. This time, actually investigate all of it, report the conclusions, and let the chips fall where they may.
#notworried
re: **Confirmed**Mueller to be #metoo’d November 1st (Cliffs in OP)
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 4:21 pm
Mueller is not concerned about this, nor should he be.
Trump and family are going to get hammered by Mueller. The orange fraud will finally face justice.
Trump and family are going to get hammered by Mueller. The orange fraud will finally face justice.
re: When does TX turn blue?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 11:13 am
Just a matter of time, considering the change of demographics.
Well, I guess it could be delayed if Republicans would cease making Hispanics their boogeymen and scapegoats, but that doesn't seem to likely any time soon.
Well, I guess it could be delayed if Republicans would cease making Hispanics their boogeymen and scapegoats, but that doesn't seem to likely any time soon.
re: List of GOP candidates who would have had the stones to even CONSIDER birthrite challenge
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 10:27 am
quote:
List of GOP candidates who would be so fricking stupid to even CONSIDER birthrite challenge
Trump
I'm finished
re: Somebody help me out here - how can a substantial portion of America vote DEM?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 10:24 am
quote:
From a per capita standpoint, it skews heaily towards black Louisianans.
So what? Are you saying that blacks shouldn't be able to utilize government benefits just as white people do?
re: What did the author of the 14th Amendment have to say about birthright citizenship?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 10:20 am
quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
There is Section 1 of the 14th A.
You will see the equal protection clause towards the end. Now when it was written, folks didn't think it would be applying to women, gays, the disabled, and others.
But it doesn't say "any person except..." The clear language states "any person" and yes that includes illegal immigrants.
Anyway, please stop trying to add exceptions to the Constitution when the clear language does not provide them. No matter what Mr. Howard may have said in an interview, the language of the 14th as passed by Congress and ratified by the States does not provide for those exceptions.
re: Somebody help me out here - how can a substantial portion of America vote DEM?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 9:59 am
quote:
I have advocated for a poll test of decades.
Good for you; however, you should know that it has been done before.

re: Somebody help me out here - how can a substantial portion of America vote DEM?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 9:54 am
quote:
He broke it down for southern states in a response.
Do you just post google images without reading?
In Louisiana there are more white people than black people who receive food stamps.
I'm sorry if this goes against your preconceived notions and biases.
re: Somebody help me out here - how can a substantial portion of America vote DEM?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 9:22 am
quote:
It's the black people (read: blue areas) in those "southern red states" that take all the government handouts.
Wow, do you spew off crap without even thinking or what? A basic Google search would have saved you the embarrassment.

re: Will the GOP campaign on balancing the budget if it loses the House?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 9:05 am
quote:
I thought it would be fun to list all the things the GOP didn’t do while controlling the House that it will say it will do if it is given the House again.
Such as repealing Obamacare?
How many times did they try under Obama, 60?
Yet with Republican majorities in the House and Senate and a Republican President, they didn't do it.
Of course, they shouldn't have.
But still it is telling that Republicans cannot keep their word.
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 8:54 am
Trump is just trying to provide a distraction from the MAGAbomber, the Nazi who shot up the synagogue, and the racist who recently killed some blacks.
And he's trying to get his base worked up before election day. Looks like it is working.
And he's trying to get his base worked up before election day. Looks like it is working.
re: Somebody help me out here - how can a substantial portion of America vote DEM?
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 8:39 am
A majority of the population is disgusted by this fraud who is President, and cannot wait until he is out of office.
This is not a mere political opponent winning an election. If he was in any way rational, for example either Bush or Reagan or Romney or damn near anyone else but Trump, then it would be just another President, so be it.
But every day he disgraces the office and embarrasses our country. Calling the press the enemy?? That is flat out unamerican, and there are many many many more examples.
This is not a mere political opponent winning an election. If he was in any way rational, for example either Bush or Reagan or Romney or damn near anyone else but Trump, then it would be just another President, so be it.
But every day he disgraces the office and embarrasses our country. Calling the press the enemy?? That is flat out unamerican, and there are many many many more examples.
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 8:33 am
quote:
So just to clarify...it's your position that the child of an illegal who is born and resides in the United States is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. They are under no obligation to follow US laws, since they are not under US jurisdiction.
That is not what I'm saying, nor could any rational person interpret my words to have such a meaning.
Go play semantics with someone else.
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 8:31 am
quote:
I'm glad you agree that, as part of the militia, the people have the right to bear arms and that it should not be infringed.
Yes.
But you seem to have forgotten a phrase, the well regulated part.
And so indeed, as a part of that regulation is why we are rightfully able to prohibit tanks, bombs, and other type of weapons from private citizens.
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am
That may have been his intent, but that wasn't the intent of the other members of Congress.
If they wanted exceptions, then they could have stated those exceptions in the 14th A.
If they wanted exceptions, then they could have stated those exceptions in the 14th A.
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 7:02 am
So now you're trying to hang your hat on "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"?
Well, ok then, let's consider that.
Assume that a Russian family visits a Trump property with the intent to give birth, and while here, they commit a crime. Or they try to avoid paying for rental fees at the property.
Would that Russian family be subject to the jurisdiction of our courts?
Well, ok then, let's consider that.
Assume that a Russian family visits a Trump property with the intent to give birth, and while here, they commit a crime. Or they try to avoid paying for rental fees at the property.
Would that Russian family be subject to the jurisdiction of our courts?
re: Trump trying to end birthright citizenship
Posted by BRTigerDad on 10/30/18 at 6:54 am
quote:
So, if an amendment included a statement that said “shall not be infringed”, then the courts cannot interpret it or limit it in any way?
I also think you could benefit from a bit of history, check out Ronald Reagan and the NRA.
Popular